One, she owes her job to the Senate. The President nominates but the Senate confirms or rejects.
Two, you have tens or hundreds of thousands possible jurors. You do not have the same with federal judges. So comparison is foolish at best… Trumpian-logic at worst.
the person with the majority of possible votes wins. if nobody does, it goes to the senate for a majority of votes.If the GOP doesn’t run someone, then the Democratic candidate will end up winning.
if every one of those homes went back on the market or was sold to the homeowners, it wouldn’t make much of a dent in the housing stock problem. The issue isn’t that (even though that is an problem – but a localized one). It’s few homes are being built that are, by definition, affordable. Too big and too high-priced because of it.
Housing market isn’t part of the inflation basket and doesn’t tie to it anyways.
Housing prices are skyrocketing again because supply is low – the continuation of few new affordably priced homes are being built and what is going on the market is priced based upon what the seller bought… and since they can’t get that, they are rarely selling.
we need more reasonable housing stock being built. And we need to reset expectations of what is a reasonably sized house. People are demanding homes that used to be laughed at as McMansions of the rich.. far larger than they could ever use.
One, she owes her job to the Senate. The President nominates but the Senate confirms or rejects.
Two, you have tens or hundreds of thousands possible jurors. You do not have the same with federal judges. So comparison is foolish at best… Trumpian-logic at worst.