JumpStart by Robb Armstrong for February 21, 2014

That’s perfect Joe

Right … lets hide away anything connected to realism, and the past.

All wedding photos are segregated…..brides family one side, grooms family other. Race once again has nothing to do with it, just this family happened to be different shades of skin.

uh, I don’t know whether photoshopping is a good idea or not.but it’s certainly worth a try!the worst that can happen is they still won’t like it, and they’ll still be back where they started.

So that’s how ya spell ebonic…

My husband, who’s handy with the photoshop thingie, photoshopped his cousin’s ex-son-in-law out of family portraits. He also photoshopped a couple in which the husband was terminally ill into our group’s Christmas party. Both were appreciated.

BTW, what Joe plans to do may change things to represent things the way they are now, instead of the way things were then.

This is going to get good.

as Knitty said, bride on one side, groom on the other.

So let’s say the bride’s side had just returned from a vacation the Bahamas and give them all a tan.

I am sorry that segregation and racial tension are being introduced to this strip.

knittyditty: Like the woman who insisted she was on the bride’s side at a wedding, until the usher said, “Madam, there will be no partisan cheering at this wedding!”..JanCinLV: No reality permitted? I’m surprised that you would read a strip that has a black middle class.

I’ve got a friend whose daughter underwent a gender change, and she had all of the pictures on the wall photoshopped so her former daughter looked more like a boy. Really silly decision, IMO; she was changing history to avoid questions from visitors.

Perhaps, they’ll photoshop some smiles for the relatives.

so, what written history is not biased by the writer?