Chuckle Bros by Brian and Ron Boychuk for March 30, 2010

  1. Zappa sheik
    ksoskins  over 14 years ago

    I guess he’s waxing philosophical.

     •  Reply
  2. Text if you d like to meet him
    Yukoneric  over 14 years ago

    Waxing and waning.

     •  Reply
  3. Foxhound1
    bald  over 14 years ago

    is that a Binford A3000 wax baller?

     •  Reply
  4. Frog4
    Digital Frog  over 14 years ago

    Nobody else holds a candle to theys guys…

     •  Reply
  5. Opus45
    poppy1313  over 14 years ago

    One explanation of the origin of the expression whole ball of wax is a modification of the whole bailiwick. The company’s name in the toon is Bollowack … very funny

     •  Reply
  6. Opus45
    poppy1313  over 14 years ago

    Joe there were hundreds of explanations as to where that expression came from.

    One is it is a modification of whole bailiwick, an association between bail and ball, and between wick and candle wax.”

    I chose that one because Ron used Bollowack as the name of the company. Who knows about these Canadians and their sense of humor :0)

     •  Reply
  7. Opus45
    poppy1313  over 14 years ago

    There was a Chuckle Bros toon a few weeks back that used the expression ‘A Dog’s breakfast’

    I emailed them thu their web page and asked about it as none of us got the joke.

    Ron emailed me back and explained it was an English expression they use in Canada meaning - A mess or muddle.

    I guess we are getting an education if nothing else by reading the toons

    http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/114550.html

     •  Reply
  8. Wolf3
    COWBOY7  over 14 years ago

    To coin a phrase, of course!

     •  Reply
  9. Deficon
    Coyoty Premium Member over 14 years ago

    Do they make knick-knack balls o’ wax?

     •  Reply
  10. Elephants
    lfanterickson  over 14 years ago

    I think this is a good place, and time (maybe too late in the day, though) to get thoughts on something I’ve wondered lately: Are people getting lazy, or is the language just evolving when they/we, say, “a whole ‘nother…” It is really putting the word “whole” in the middle of “another”. I appreciate the living language, but should this be considered “standard” or “non-standard”?

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Chuckle Bros