Always remember, people accusing others of being several stories removed from reality within the confines of their ivory towers, may always be said to have an inferior viewpoint, thus dismissing their observations as lacking perspective.
If I had thought to do the obvious before it had become obvious after many failures, that would make me a genius.You probably shouldn’t expect that to happen, though.Still… fat-head seems a rather apt invective, the brain being basically just a blob of fat.
It does appear to be a stereopticon picture, but crossing your eyes to combine the images is the reverse imposition, creating an inverse discrepancy where near objects seem to be farther away. The distant mountains would be too far to be adequately represented in 3D rendering by your brain when the central objects are viewed. And it is not unusual for two cameras, or one camera with two views taken over a period of time with still subjects, to have slight differences in lighting or exposure. To do it properly, you need identical cameras with identical manual settings affixed to a stable platform at the proper distance.Or, and I find this to be quite likely, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah-blah-blah-blah-blah…
Meh~tdology, fka Pepelaputr over 8 years ago
Your plain and average political rally and comments board dedicated to same.
Randy B Premium Member over 8 years ago
Bring a dictionary and smack him with it when he says something stupid.
Brass Orchid Premium Member over 8 years ago
If not for fatuous content, I would have no content at all.Some might consider this as a negative attribute.I think of it as 99.9% pure.
Peam Premium Member over 8 years ago
Brought to you by the makers of ’ShoeCabbages for Dummies."
Sisyphos over 8 years ago
You are my light and my dictionary!Did you ever hear a more romantic phrase?
Brass Orchid Premium Member over 8 years ago
Always remember, people accusing others of being several stories removed from reality within the confines of their ivory towers, may always be said to have an inferior viewpoint, thus dismissing their observations as lacking perspective.
*Hot Rod* over 8 years ago
Carry your dictionary Carrie…
prince valiant Premium Member over 8 years ago
Ah, you spoiled it! I was just reaching for the dictionary when I scrolled down farther.
Lyons Group, Inc. over 8 years ago
Okay I’ll stay quiet.
Brass Orchid Premium Member over 8 years ago
If I had thought to do the obvious before it had become obvious after many failures, that would make me a genius.You probably shouldn’t expect that to happen, though.Still… fat-head seems a rather apt invective, the brain being basically just a blob of fat.
William Neal McPheeters over 8 years ago
Asinine fatuity!!! Ne dis pas de bêtises!!!
Brass Orchid Premium Member over 8 years ago
It does appear to be a stereopticon picture, but crossing your eyes to combine the images is the reverse imposition, creating an inverse discrepancy where near objects seem to be farther away. The distant mountains would be too far to be adequately represented in 3D rendering by your brain when the central objects are viewed. And it is not unusual for two cameras, or one camera with two views taken over a period of time with still subjects, to have slight differences in lighting or exposure. To do it properly, you need identical cameras with identical manual settings affixed to a stable platform at the proper distance.Or, and I find this to be quite likely, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah-blah-blah-blah-blah…
Ray_C over 8 years ago
I have always admired betise. Expressionism is cool.