Surprisingly accurate.
Is it only art if it is clever?
Or should it always have to last forever?
Isn’t it art if it soon starts to molder?
Well, all art’s in the eye of the beholder…
Oh dear, Horace, I think you hung it upside down.
A prize-winning effort!
Forgot to smear it around a bit.
It’s no Jackson Poll-ock, but it might sell.
sadly, it would still be considered art…
A Pollack, he’s not…
The dirty tablecloth is by far the best.
Improvise. Adapt. Overcome.
Art is whatever you can get away with.
https://www.sfgate.com/art/article/Museum-janitors-mistake-modern-art-for-trash-6596479.php
Horace, quite an eye for art!
I’ve had the idea for a Jackson P. by way of Rube Goldberg, but it’ll take more talent than mine to assemble.
Funny Horace since art is in the eye of the beholder, especially in abstract art.
Did he make a “sculpture” out of the bowl and glasses?
Now there’s an abstract with flair, with impact, with … punch. :)
Somewhere I had a color photo of a well-used pizza pan, with radii from slicing.
To complete the red-green-blue triptych.
No, back to front. Generally, abstract art is for the artistically challenged I.e. doesn’t know one end of a brush from the other
July 31, 2015
Imagine about 2 years ago
Surprisingly accurate.
in-dubio-pro-rainbow about 2 years ago
Is it only art if it is clever?
Or should it always have to last forever?
Isn’t it art if it soon starts to molder?
Well, all art’s in the eye of the beholder…
robinafox about 2 years ago
Oh dear, Horace, I think you hung it upside down.
rshive about 2 years ago
A prize-winning effort!
danketaz Premium Member about 2 years ago
Forgot to smear it around a bit.
Doug K about 2 years ago
It’s no Jackson Poll-ock, but it might sell.
Chris about 2 years ago
sadly, it would still be considered art…
Zebrastripes about 2 years ago
A Pollack, he’s not…
Alberta Oil Premium Member about 2 years ago
The dirty tablecloth is by far the best.
KEA about 2 years ago
Improvise. Adapt. Overcome.
Teto85 Premium Member about 2 years ago
Art is whatever you can get away with.
tony_n_jen2003 about 2 years ago
https://www.sfgate.com/art/article/Museum-janitors-mistake-modern-art-for-trash-6596479.php
charles9156 about 2 years ago
Horace, quite an eye for art!
Stephen Gilberg about 2 years ago
I’ve had the idea for a Jackson P. by way of Rube Goldberg, but it’ll take more talent than mine to assemble.
Night-Gaunt49[Bozo is Boffo] about 2 years ago
Funny Horace since art is in the eye of the beholder, especially in abstract art.
BasilBruce about 2 years ago
Did he make a “sculpture” out of the bowl and glasses?
mistercatworks about 2 years ago
Now there’s an abstract with flair, with impact, with … punch. :)
JH&Cats about 2 years ago
Somewhere I had a color photo of a well-used pizza pan, with radii from slicing.
Zesty about 2 years ago
To complete the red-green-blue triptych.
aussie399 Premium Member about 2 years ago
No, back to front. Generally, abstract art is for the artistically challenged I.e. doesn’t know one end of a brush from the other