Frazz by Jef Mallett for April 15, 2023

  1. Img 1931
    Sanspareil  over 1 year ago

    It doesn’t have to be brightly coloured, subtlety is also a virtue!

     •  Reply
  2. Green 5 point celtic knot 300
    Erse IS better  over 1 year ago

    So, If I had running shoes, at that rate, they’d last a lifetime.

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    diazch408  over 1 year ago

    And it lets Frazz and Miss Plainwell go far on their dates.

     •  Reply
  4. Img 1754  2
    GiantShetlandPony  over 1 year ago

    There are two kinds of people. Those that wear out the tops of their shoes first and those that wear out the soles of their shoes first. I tend to wear out the soles first.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    ewaldoh  over 1 year ago

    What’s a pair of shoes every couple months for “singles” with income? Give them a couple kids with all new stuff every couple months plus food every couple hours; and they’ll be stretching their shoes 5-10 years like me.

     •  Reply
  6. Avt freyjaw nurse48
    FreyjaRN Premium Member over 1 year ago

    They got it right, from my first orthopedist’s perspective. He said to get new shoes every 300 miles (482.8 km), and ASICS or New Balance on sale are just fine. You don’t need to spend over $100 when you can spend $40.

     •  Reply
  7. Mr haney
    NeedaChuckle Premium Member over 1 year ago

    I wear good moccasins and they last a couple of years. According to my fitbit, I walk about 10 miles a week. So 1000 miles. I know I should do more, so don’t preach.

     •  Reply
  8. Spike  profie 2 edit
    Jhony-Yermo  over 1 year ago

    I won’t disagree, because that is what my daughter does. And not trying to say that Jef, Frazz, and Ms Plainwell are not correct, But me? I like minimalist shoes that are zero-drop. Only replace when totally destroyed.

     •  Reply
  9. Face
    BadCreaturesBecomeDems  over 1 year ago

    I had no idea shoes lasted that long.

     •  Reply
  10. Picture 001
    rshive  over 1 year ago

    I used to run on the Mississippi River bottoms. Boring. Soybeans as far as the eye could see.

     •  Reply
  11. A07653a8 c2c4 4ae8 924d 20adc3172cc0
    Jimmyk939  over 1 year ago

    And it’s good for your sole…soul?

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    tsk5565  over 1 year ago

    The colorist should have made the shoes they’re wearing brightly colored

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    Cozmik Cowboy  over 1 year ago

    Want 1) the fastest times and 2) the best foot health?

    Run barefoot (or as close to it as you can stand). Running with several pounds of (obscenely expensive) junk wrapped around your feet is exactly the wrong thing to do. Nothing, or at least so-thin-they’re-almost-not-there shoes, is by far the better way. The success of Nike, et al is 100% due to pure horseshi……er, marketing.

     •  Reply
  14. 38096534 2543 4864 8509 d06fceeba3fb
    Brent Rosenthal Premium Member over 1 year ago

    And then the old shoes eventually take up landfill space.

     •  Reply
  15. Copy of msg apa181
    The Brooklyn Accent Premium Member over 1 year ago

    “And I would run 500 miles

    And I would run 500 more

    To buy a pair of running shoes

    And one more pair from the same store…"

     •  Reply
  16. Bluedog
    Bilan  over 1 year ago

    300 to 500 miles? Can they put odometers on the shoes then?

     •  Reply
  17. Anim chromosomes
    chromosome Premium Member over 1 year ago

    I don’t drive and I have most of the things I do within about 1 to 2.5 miles away. I usually walk to all of them unless the weather is awful, then I’ll either reschedule or get a ride from someone who lives near me. I replace running shoes about once a year (often have 2 pairs I alternate). If someone thinks that’s expensive, I just tell them they’re still cheaper than tires.

     •  Reply
  18. Fishbulb
    fishbulb239  over 1 year ago

    Seems like such a low number that it’s likely an invention of the shoe companies themselves. If I applied that same standard to walking shoes, they’d last only a little more than 2 months. Absurd.

     •  Reply
  19. Plsa button
    Richard S Russell Premium Member over 1 year ago

    No, you’re running now so you can support the knee-brace industry in a decade and orthopedic surgery in two.

     •  Reply
  20. Whatever
    unfair.de  over 1 year ago

    When shoes are tattered they still consist of 90% or more of their original material. Seems to me there should be a recycling process even when more is needed than just replacement of the soles.

    Expert replacement of soles work – when you do it in time before their wear affects the other parts. Especially when you use them often the decay of the material is of no influence as they are worn out faster than they age.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Frazz