Doonesbury by Garry Trudeau for June 12, 2010

  1. Zappa sheik
    ksoskins  over 14 years ago

    Lower it right on top of Duke; that’ll help prevent more verbal pollution.

     •  Reply
  2. Senmurv
    mrsullenbeauty  over 14 years ago

    I think he’s pointing to his shoulder; the initials stand for “bursitis prophylactic.”

     •  Reply
  3. Carnac
    AKHenderson Premium Member over 14 years ago

    Between the oil and Duke’s alcohol fumes, the bird didn’t stand a chance.

     •  Reply
  4. B3b2b771 4dd5 4067 bfef 5ade241cb8c2
    cdward  over 14 years ago

    ^Just nobody light a match around Duke!

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    Technojunkie  over 14 years ago

    Your BP conspiracy theory of the day: http://www.blogster.com/joannemor/bombshell-expose-the-real-reason-the-oil-still-flows-into-the-gulf-of-mexico

     •  Reply
  6. Ip1
    IncognitoPenguin  over 14 years ago

    Looks like the BIRDS are the ones that are unflappable…

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    MorganZ  over 14 years ago

    @horace_manoor: And who would that be, in your opinion ? (Good pseudonym. Says alot about you.)

     •  Reply
  8. Text if you d like to meet him
    Yukoneric  over 14 years ago

    When does BP receive the bill?

     •  Reply
  9. Bleach ichigo
    NoBrandName  over 14 years ago

    People are always complaining about the high price of gas. Yet here BP is trying to give it away for free (although un-refined) and people are still complaining.

    What, too soon? XD

     •  Reply
  10. Logo
    cdhaley  over 14 years ago

    Mr. Andrews’s response implies that even BP is getting fed up with Duke’s efforts to deny reality. Enough already of what Sheik calls “verbal pollution”!

    The main consumers of Duke’s verbal pollution, of course, are stockholders and those of us who continue to use BP’s product without feeling guilty.

    Duke is being paid to shield all of us from having to face the magnitude of this disaster. As one of BP’s naive apologists said on Thursday, “How foolish all the people sound who talk as if BP wanted this to happen” (pschearer)

    He’s right that we foolishly deny the ugly reality by vilifying BP. His own folly is to deny BP’s negligence by excusing them. BP was irresponsible from the start, when they let their greed overrule common sense and denied the very possibility of a spill.

    To drill for oil a mile beneath the ocean without imagining the consequences–that’s denying reality. BP foresaw only profits, not this incalculable loss.

     •  Reply
  11. Dscn0012
    cfimeiatpap  over 14 years ago

    Just in case anyone thinks we have something to say about this catastrophe; I’m afraid it’s a little dated but interesting reading………….

    http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/spotlight-the-us-militarys-march-2010-fuel-contracts-03176/

     •  Reply
  12. Nebulous100
    Nebulous Premium Member over 14 years ago

    @NoBrandName: It may be too soon for some, but it made me laugh.

     •  Reply
  13. Carnac
    AKHenderson Premium Member over 14 years ago

    Since Katrina got mentioned a few times this week, I have a question…what was so different between the government response to that storm and all the others before it? I lived within 2 miles of the Gulf of Mexico for the first 27 years of my life, and I can’t tell. If anything, the US Navy was more involved in evacuations than usual. I know that people complained about FEMA being late to the scene, but that’s always been FEMA’s SOP ever since Carter created the agency.

     •  Reply
  14. Big dipper
    SuperGriz  over 14 years ago

    The effect on wildlife certainly impacted on Duke.

     •  Reply
  15. Logo
    cdhaley  over 14 years ago

    I’ve seen worse while standing in Trafalgar Square, SuperGriz. At least we’re warned by the “WHOOSH!”

     •  Reply
  16. Big dipper
    SuperGriz  over 14 years ago

    lol

     •  Reply
  17. Big dipper
    SuperGriz  over 14 years ago

    stebon,

    STFU.

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    longtimecomicsfan  over 14 years ago

    Are these the same conservatives who decried the Obamanation for stepping in and “nationalizing” the banks and car companies, who are now decrying the fact that the government HASN’T taken over a foreign company?

     •  Reply
  19. Cathy aack
    lindz.coop Premium Member over 14 years ago

    longtime – one and the same!!

    At least one bird fought back. Good thing Duke didn’t have his usual lit cigarette hanging out.

     •  Reply
  20. Deficon
    Coyoty Premium Member over 14 years ago

    Horace and Stebon (has anyone ever seen them in the same room together?) must be BP executives. No amount of negative reaction to them seems to sink into their GT-fixated brains. Maybe there’s nothing there to penetrate.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Doonesbury