What’s “interesting” is that the “weather oddities” are exactly what the climate change models predicted, and deniers don’t get it. Yes, fennec, all that moisture from the over-heated Atlantic provides the fuel for the snow, and, well, never mind, they’ll never get it.
Not paying attention to the news, are you? A climate skeptic funded by the Koch brothers actually admits that the science was right — the Earth is warming, almost precisely the amount the research has says!Being a jerk, he is also saying that “we have set new standards for good research,” but that’s just stupid, since obviously the original research was good.
I gotta hand it to the AGW crowd. They have created a brilliant scam. One of the most ingenious I’ve ever seen. They have convinced millions of Americans with low IQs that…
.
If it’s too warm, that’s global warmingIf it’s too cold, that’s global warmingIf it snows too little, that’s global warming.If it snows too much, that’s global warming.If it rains too little, that’s global warming.If it rains too much, that’s global warming.If their team doesn’t win the championship, that’s global warming.If the neighbor’s dog poops in their yard, that’s global warming.If the coffee shop is out of pecan pie, that’s global warming
.
And still, too this day, there is not one shred of evidence positively linking anything man has done to global warming. Not one. But the ice rods from the arctic, geological surveys, tree rings and many other things have shown evidence that AGW is a myth.
.
But then when you’re trying to start a new religion, you want to stay as far away from facts as you can…
Taking a statistical average of the past century is the planetary equivalent of watching the DJIA from 12:01:04 to 12:01:08 on Tuesday and making all your financial decisions for the next 20 years based solely on that.
.
In short, your science is just as flawed as the rest of the AGW crowd.
.
Me? I’d take the average of the past 5000-10,000 years. And when you do that, we’re right smack dab in the middle.
phuhknees over 12 years ago
…said the clown in long-johns.
pirate227 over 12 years ago
More useful than rock candy where the nor’easter hit.
Dtroutma over 12 years ago
What’s “interesting” is that the “weather oddities” are exactly what the climate change models predicted, and deniers don’t get it. Yes, fennec, all that moisture from the over-heated Atlantic provides the fuel for the snow, and, well, never mind, they’ll never get it.
Tue Elung-Jensen over 12 years ago
Gief that weather over here – loooove the snow and especially a good storm :)
Noveltman over 12 years ago
I wish I could tell you that you’ll be so disappointed when you die, but … darn, you’ll cease to exist just like the rest of us!
Motivemagus over 12 years ago
Not paying attention to the news, are you? A climate skeptic funded by the Koch brothers actually admits that the science was right — the Earth is warming, almost precisely the amount the research has says!Being a jerk, he is also saying that “we have set new standards for good research,” but that’s just stupid, since obviously the original research was good.
grayhares01 over 12 years ago
I gotta hand it to the AGW crowd. They have created a brilliant scam. One of the most ingenious I’ve ever seen. They have convinced millions of Americans with low IQs that…
.
If it’s too warm, that’s global warmingIf it’s too cold, that’s global warmingIf it snows too little, that’s global warming.If it snows too much, that’s global warming.If it rains too little, that’s global warming.If it rains too much, that’s global warming.If their team doesn’t win the championship, that’s global warming.If the neighbor’s dog poops in their yard, that’s global warming.If the coffee shop is out of pecan pie, that’s global warming
.
And still, too this day, there is not one shred of evidence positively linking anything man has done to global warming. Not one. But the ice rods from the arctic, geological surveys, tree rings and many other things have shown evidence that AGW is a myth.
.
But then when you’re trying to start a new religion, you want to stay as far away from facts as you can…
grayhares01 over 12 years ago
fennec. what exactly is normal?
grayhares01 over 12 years ago
Past century? Are you mental?
.
Taking a statistical average of the past century is the planetary equivalent of watching the DJIA from 12:01:04 to 12:01:08 on Tuesday and making all your financial decisions for the next 20 years based solely on that.
.
In short, your science is just as flawed as the rest of the AGW crowd.
.
Me? I’d take the average of the past 5000-10,000 years. And when you do that, we’re right smack dab in the middle.
grayhares01 over 12 years ago
So the peer reviewed ice rod study is not enough for you? Or the strata study?
.
Go ahead. Google those. They might just make you pull your head out of the sand…