Fred Basset en Español by Alex Graham for October 12, 2016

I don’t get the “Wiki” label. Wikileaks has proven that it’s pro-Russia (and therefore pro-Trump). Certainly, if you’re looking for a “loser,” it’s not Clinton, who is winning currently by a bigger margin than any candidate since WWII.

This cartoon makes no sense at all.

You should not elect Trump because it is “icky” to assault women. You should not elect Clinton because her emails were leaked by Wiki-leaks who has ties to the Trump campaign. This is not a very good equivalence. There isn’t even anything in her mails to suggest she has tried to grab anyone’s pussy. You might as well have put email, Benghazi or some other dumb made up GOP silliness.

Being evenhanded these days means you have to rely a lot upon false equivalence. It’s not easy.

Nice artworkYes, both candidates are unpleasant, greedy, and self-absorbedOne will be same old crap; the other would be a disasterI’m voting same old crapThe American Plutocracy will contnue regardless though

Hen3ry 567

There is an Assauge-Ecuadoran connection. Can you make something out of that which will alarm the populace?

Aye.

Actually what this points out is the importance of the internet on modern elections. It’s Trump’s Tweets vs. Hillary’s email woes. Which will win? I just wish like Clinton, we could just delete this whole mess

No it is true. Clinton is also a looser. She did a lot of nasty things in her political career. Espacially agressivly covering her husband. She did (and do) this because she had a strong tendency for power.Nasty Bill can grab and do the same and even worse things than Trump as long as he doesn t stay in her way. She will protect him as usual. At the end you voters are the loosers, because you can only choose with which kind of whip you are beaten.

Emails revealing the Clinton’s friends were bringing aid to Haiti to save thousands of lives through their contacts. Cheney, Rumsfeld emails and “deals” with Lockheed (Lynn was on the board) and other MIC corporations to bring war and DEATH to people around the world, much more civilized, right??

This is the old false equivalency argument. Both candidates are terrible, so don’t vote for either of them.

No. Clinton is flawed, to be sure, but Trump possesses nowhere near the temperament, discipline or knowledge to be President.

@ARodney, if the polls are correct then the democrats shouldn’t be belittling me for voting for a third candidate. But the dems know that most of those polled for Clinton,and the anti-Trumpers will be to lazy to get into election booths to back their opinions. Whereas the Trump voters (known &secretive) are fanatic enough to get to those election polls.

But where is “Tycky”?

Steve, I get your point, but one of them’s gonna be the Prez.

Neither of them is not a choice we have.

It’s probably not worth nitpicking someone’s spelling & grammar with a reply full of grammar & spelling errors.

Take about 5 steps back from the car wreck, folx, and realize that this is what resulted from Justice Anthony Kennedy’s staggeringly fatuous statement in Citizens United (2010) that big money in politics will lead to “neither corruption nor the appearance of corruption”. Are corporations people? Is free spending equal to free speech? In the US, in 2016, the legal answers are yes and yes. And this is what we’ll keep getting until we can amend the Constitution to say otherwise.

I’ve disagreed with you on a number of things, Steve, but you hit it with this one. The 2016 sElection will not be won at the ballot box, but in the computers. We the People are being Hacked, Trumped and Billaried.

pretty funny names actually :) Thanks for the chuckle.