I think, Munch and Ken are anatomically similar.
back in 1960 I learned a little about anatomical differences from my older sister’s dolls. Very little.
If you’re of a certain age, no doubt a flat-top Ken.
I’m sorry, I don’t ken that…
Of course, Ken was then considered an “action figure” instead of a doll (Ken is/was a doll). Once a boy touched any doll, it immediately became an action figure. Girls didn’t need to rename toy trucks or anything.
Pedantic thought here – Barbie was introduced in 1959, so it was the 55th Anniversary if this strip first ran in 2014, per the date notation. Oh well.
Stuart Carlson
BE THIS GUY about 2 years ago
I think, Munch and Ken are anatomically similar.
klbdds about 2 years ago
back in 1960 I learned a little about anatomical differences from my older sister’s dolls. Very little.
goboboyd about 2 years ago
If you’re of a certain age, no doubt a flat-top Ken.
davidob about 2 years ago
I’m sorry, I don’t ken that…
Moonkey Premium Member about 2 years ago
Of course, Ken was then considered an “action figure” instead of a doll (Ken is/was a doll). Once a boy touched any doll, it immediately became an action figure. Girls didn’t need to rename toy trucks or anything.
CoffeeBob Premium Member about 2 years ago
Pedantic thought here – Barbie was introduced in 1959, so it was the 55th Anniversary if this strip first ran in 2014, per the date notation. Oh well.