Lio by Mark Tatulli for June 15, 2022

so what does that analysis tell us humans?

A scientist does an experiment with a frog. He places it on a table and yells at it. The frog jumps 3 feet. The scientist notes: Frog with four legs jumps 5 feet. He cuts off one of the legs, places it on the table and yells at it again. The frog jumps only 2 feet. The scientist notes: Frog with 3 legs jumps 2 feet. He cuts off another leg, places it on the table and yells at it again. This time the frog jumps only 1 foot. The scientist notes: Frog with 2 legs jumps 1 foot. He cuts off one more leg, places it on the table and yells at it again. This time the frog only jumps 2 inches. The scientist notes: Frog with 1 leg jumps 2 inches. He cuts off the last leg, places it on the table and yells at it again. The frog doesn’t move. He yells at it again and still it does not move. The scientist notes: Frog with no legs is deaf.

So you decided to play a game of “blinkmanship”, huh, Dr. Lio?

thats bad science. one data point does not support such an absolutist conclusion, Lio

I think Lio’s eyes are glued open. I’ve never seen him blink, although his eyelids are seen when he was reading Cat in the Bag recently.

That is because Mark Tatulli drew him blinking first!

Is that why he gave the robot the ability to blink? To win a contest?