Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for March 17, 2013

  1. 11 06 126
    Varnes  over 11 years ago

    Who says Sunday comics can’t continue the story? You just have to be good…And Wiley’s well known as being indisputably great,so it’s easy for him… but still, it’s pretty cool….

     •  Reply
  2. 11 06 126
    Varnes  over 11 years ago

    But, seriously, how do we know Jeffry isn’t already a zombie?" BTW, could he have come back ten seconds before he left? Because that would be kinda cool to see….

     •  Reply
  3. Pirate63
    Linguist  over 11 years ago

    I bet Jeffery know what Danae’s going to become and he doesn’t dare tell her !Lá Fhéile Pádraig Shona!Happy Saint Patrick’s Day !

     •  Reply
  4. 11 06 126
    Varnes  over 11 years ago

    I love Danae’s expression in panel one….And is it just me, or is that thing bigger on the inside than it is on the outside? Now THAT’S ergonomics…..

     •  Reply
  5. Snoopy rides again
    The#1BoiseStateFan  over 11 years ago

    Hard to take in no ZA for Jeffrey.

     •  Reply
  6. Avatar 10349
    WillardMBaker  over 11 years ago

    Actually, the scale of third panel is larger. Note the size of Jeffery and how crowded it is in there for him.

     •  Reply
  7. Image035
    Odd Dog Premium Member over 11 years ago

    He doesn’t want to tell her there married with children

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    Proginoskes  over 11 years ago

    @ Odd Dog: “they are” = they’re. “at that place” = there. “belonging to them” = their. I know, that’s so hard to remember, getting three common words correct.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    BenderSastre  over 11 years ago

    Kid’s got a time machine and he choses to go into medical research?! He has no idea how to take advantage of technology.

     •  Reply
  10. Picture 22
    jack fairbanks  over 11 years ago

    bumfoozled by yacka-fratzen! (future realists)

     •  Reply
  11. Deficon
    Coyoty Premium Member over 11 years ago

    So Jeffrey does fulfill his dream of fighting zombies.

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    Rainfoot  over 11 years ago

    In theory if you traveled to the future you would not be able to see what happens to yourself because you would of been a missing person sence the date you left. I think Wells discused about this in The Time Machine.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    Tue Elung-Jensen  over 11 years ago

    He just didn´t go far enough into the future..

     •  Reply
  14. Millionchimps1
    tripwire45  over 11 years ago

    You mean we still have a country by the time you grow up?

     •  Reply
  15. Evil rat
    Bill Chapman  over 11 years ago
    This is why I could care less about nuclear or chemical weapons, they are a short-lived form of destruction – even if they may kill millions in seconds or in a horrible way.The only WMD I truly worry about is biological weapons – once they are released they are out of the bottle(like the proverbial Genie), and can NOT be put back. They are LIVING weapons, which means that no matter what we may do to ‘control’ them, there IS a possibility them they could mutate into something we can not kill before it wipes out the human race … or even most of the life on the planet.They don’t even need to kill us … all is needed is a major contagious animal or plant disease to kill off most of either one and humans will starve and kill each other over what food may remain….

    Humanity NEEDS to create a self sustaining base on the Moon. The scientific benefits would be incredible, but it would also serve as a last-chance for humanity to survive a world threatening incident.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    dabugger  over 11 years ago

    So, the kids mimicked the republicans who misuse meaningfulness to their advantage. Just a bit of pubescent hypocrisy.

     •  Reply
  17. Papa smurf walking smiling
    route66paul  over 11 years ago

    self sustaining base on the moon. Since the moon does not have enough gravity to keep an atmosphere, that would be a good trick. How could you assure an unending amount of the gases need to breathe and sustain plant life, as well as a working food chain. Until anti gravity is invented, there is no way to keep 100% of the atmosphere needed for life.

     •  Reply
  18. Screenshot 2024 11 11 082256
    Defective Premium Member over 11 years ago

    Wow, I wasn’t expecting the conclusion today. I’ve heard you have to send in all the strips involved with a Sunday publication REALLY early, rather than just a couple weeks early as with weekday ones.

    Surprised, and a little disappointed. A future trip could have been a good storyline.

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    jahoody  over 11 years ago

    Thank you Proginoskes……bad grammar always upsets me.

     •  Reply
  20. Coloradofiedcalifornia
    californicated1  over 11 years ago

    …And it is that kind of circular argument that keeps governments cloaked in secrecy and agencies like the TSA running.…They can’t exactly tell us what they have done to keep us safe, only that they have done it.…And we wonder why these governments and their agencies cost so much…

     •  Reply
  21. Masked
    Rickapolis  over 11 years ago

    So…he doesn’t have a zombie in the time machine with him?

     •  Reply
  22. Monk
    Mokurai  over 11 years ago

    Danae is confronted by the impossibility of convincing a nutjob conspiracy-type theorist of any form of truth, and is equally incapable of drawing the correct conclusion from this experience. Now where have we encountered that problem?

    Has anybody been watching the coverage of CPAC?

     •  Reply
  23. 1175703 628288277203175 166978261 n
    Caddy57  over 11 years ago

    Nothing to see here folks….just move along…..

     •  Reply
  24. Lonelemming
    Ernest Lemmingway  over 11 years ago

    Humans in the modern world achieving, much less maintaining, self-sustaining practices. ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!! Now tell me the one about Bigfoot and the honest politician! Humanity has proven, time and time again, that they’re either too apathetic or too greedy to change their ways. The zombies that kill us off won’t be walking corpses, they’ll be us as we are right now. Blindly thinking “things will be better in the future.” That’s the thing about “the future;” it soon becomes the present.

     •  Reply
  25. Kmcavatar ghost rider by vehementstudios d5qm5hd
    Jason Case  over 11 years ago

    By that you mean that she would change?

     •  Reply
  26. Siberian tigers 22
    Hunter7  over 11 years ago

    Did Jeffrey go far enough into the future? Just because he discovered he was head of the CDC doesn’t mean he stopped the Zombies. Only that there were none around when he was in the future.

     •  Reply
  27. 1175703 628288277203175 166978261 n
    Caddy57  over 11 years ago

    Aaaand it won’t be long until they start calling him Doctor What…..becaaaaause drum roll please…..Doctor Who is already taken…..YESSSSSSSSS

     •  Reply
  28. Frank frazetta wolfmoon s
    ossiningaling  over 11 years ago

    Sure there’s no zombie apocalypse. If you don’t count the CDC being run by booger-brained boys!

     •  Reply
  29. Oakley penny x metal ruby i
    Zero-Gabriel  over 11 years ago

    You got to love Girls, they so incredibly easy and fun to ANNOY…

     •  Reply
  30. Missing large
    suzleigh  over 11 years ago

    Centers for Danae Control

     •  Reply
  31. Missing large
    Beleck3  over 11 years ago

    grammar police? lol. just incredible ignorance in spelling. that is enough in itself. the ability to communicate, say what you want and have someone else other than you get it. with Google as a dictionary, it’s hard to believe bad spelling isn’t a personal attack on the minds of others. The zombies of language. just hurts to see bad language in the age of the internet. more Repubican behavior. no attempt to be “factual”.

    lol. somethings never change.

     •  Reply
  32. 1787776c 5399 4da3 91dd efc533a364c7
    Archistoteles  9 months ago

    So, instead of zombies we got Covid?

     •  Reply
  33. Missing large
    sendelbachvernon34  3 months ago

    so Jeffrey topped Danae with her own logic

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur