Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for September 10, 2014

  1. Be7
    Miny Boy  about 10 years ago

    Chad?

     •  Reply
  2. Ek at joes
    geneking7320  about 10 years ago

    Jeffery’s hair looks different here…

     •  Reply
  3. Willin 2
    bluskies  about 10 years ago

    If you’re close to Florida, be very careful. They’ve been known to hang chads down there.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    Observer fo Irony  about 10 years ago

    Danae is negotiating; I wonder what she wants now?

     •  Reply
  5. 11 06 126
    Varnes  about 10 years ago

    bluskies, thanks for the laugh……

     •  Reply
  6. Camera1 016
    keenanthelibrarian  about 10 years ago

    Aha!! So Jeffrey WAS involved … watch this space – or perhaps the next one. Or maybe something else in the Space/Time Continuum …

     •  Reply
  7. Screenshot 2024 11 11 082256
    Defective Premium Member about 10 years ago

    I like story time and this one promises to be interesting!

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    dabugger  about 10 years ago

    Someone we know is listening to their conspiracy

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    Argy.Bargy2  about 10 years ago

    Jeffrey accepted the deal, so he must not want his invention to be a total secret after all…

     •  Reply
  10. 75mssne
    tygrkhat40  about 10 years ago

    “The Incident?” “Ginger nerd with a time machine?” Why do I have a feeling that this is filed under “Things Man was not Meant to Know?”

     •  Reply
  11. Snoopy pensive typewriter
    The Life I Draw Upon  about 10 years ago

    The Traveler.

     •  Reply
  12. Brain 40
    Daniel Quilp  about 10 years ago

    “No, Chad from Chad and Jeremy, the singing duo from the 1960’s. It is just a name not an identity.”

    In an early strip of Zits, Jeremy had a brother who was in college. His name was Chad. I got the connection.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    Observer fo Irony  about 10 years ago

    @Night-Gaunt49Is that where you came from.. a different evolution of Earth. Welcome visitor; now go back where you came form.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur