Peanuts Begins by Charles Schulz for July 27, 2016

Interesting thing about encyclopedias… If you read through a set from the late 1800s, you’d be amazed at the stuff people “knew” to be true… stuff which has since been proven to be complete bilge.

Charlie Brown? You’re probably better knowing this now rather than later: a girl is always right — especially when she’s wrong…

True enough. But on the whole, if you examined, say, a thousand randomly selected propositions from a respected encyclopedia of the day, a far larger proportion would be accurate than not. Certainly such a book would be a better source of information than folk knowledge as such. If one’s standard for a useful, reliable reference is one without error… well, that person is on a religious quest.

Wikipedia is great as you can re-write everything true in your own viewpoint.

Ain’t Mama happy, ain’t nobody happy. And papa happy, ain’t nobody care.

Wish we knew what they were arguing about

What a wuss…

“If a man spoke in a forest, and a woman wasn’t there to hear him, would he still be wrong?”

No one likes a smarty-pants.

In todays world if you are not right you must not have a smart phone.

I wish to know what they were discussing about.

“I read it in an encyclopedia*, therefore it must be true!”

*What they said before the internet.