Pearls Before Swine by Stephan Pastis for June 25, 2017

  1. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY  over 7 years ago

    “…and most rats are geniuses.”

     •  Reply
  2. Right here
    Sherlock Watson  over 7 years ago

    This is why (a) books are better than “e-readers,” and (b) libraries must never be allowed to die out.

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    Arbitrary  over 7 years ago

    This is why I ask for sources whenever people attempt to do thinks like deny climate change or evolution. Almost always the sources will be the same 2 specific blogs. Said blogs usually get their information from other blogs, or on rare occasions a magazine. If I’m very lucky, it’ll be a scientific journal within 4 leaps. Usually by then I find out they misrepresented the paper somewhere, likely when you notice the first blog to report it has an obvious agenda.

    Telephone for the modern age.

     •  Reply
  4. B986e866 14d0 4607 bdb4 5d76d7b56ddb
    Templo S.U.D.  over 7 years ago

    Rat, you dirty trickster you

     •  Reply
  5. Bluedog
    Bilan  over 7 years ago

    How can the message boards and blogs be incorrect? That’s where Trump gets his facts.

    (You knew somebody was going to say that)

     •  Reply
  6. Airhornmissc
    Liverlips McCracken Premium Member over 7 years ago

    Is Rat’s surname “Bannon” by any chance?

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    gammaguy  over 7 years ago

    Disconnect from all technology? Good luck with that.

     •  Reply
  8. Duck1275
    Brass Orchid Premium Member over 7 years ago

    All you need to do is look at the history of humankind to see that all humans are idiots.

    And they are generally at their worst when they believe they are at their best.

    Goat, in denying the premise despite the mountain of evidence, proves its value.

     •  Reply
  9. Desron14
    Masterskrain  over 7 years ago

    We KNEW where THAT was gonna lead…

     •  Reply
  10. Avatar2
    Walrus Gumbo Premium Member over 7 years ago

    When you look at our current (president?), it’s hard to deny that assumption!

     •  Reply
  11. Nebulous100
    Nebulous Premium Member over 7 years ago

    Not an original argument, but it needs to be repeated occasionally.Consider how stupid the average person is.Now consider that half of the population is worse than that.

     •  Reply
  12. Celtic knot1 th
    UBBM Premium Member over 7 years ago

    Next week is my one year anniversary of quitting Facebook. It’s a good starting point.

     •  Reply
  13. Mr haney
    NeedaChuckle Premium Member over 7 years ago

    Trying to find unbiased info on the net is a daunting task. So much is personal biases. Snopes is pretty good for some subjects and Politfacts isn’t bad.

     •  Reply
  14. Pdog
    PrairieDog37  over 7 years ago

    To quote Dogbert from and old competing strip, “I’ve probably sneezed more brain cells than the average human uses on election day.”

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    tigre1again  over 7 years ago

    Thanks. I’m going to the local bookstore and get a used bio of HRC. I don’t think I need to learn to curse nor swear, so I won’t lose my soul researching her on-line.

     •  Reply
  16. Pig
    A_NY_Outlaw  over 7 years ago

    I am with rat on this one.

     •  Reply
  17. Large airbrush 20240305192116
    Number Three  over 7 years ago

    Plenty of idiots here on GoComics. Oh and on Youtube. Definitely Youtube.

    xxx

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large 2
    Phatts  over 7 years ago

    I’m surprised Pig actually bothered to check all the references. Most articles don’t post references (especially if there are none) and even when they do, most people don’t check them.

     •  Reply
  19. Gentbear3b1a
    Gent  over 7 years ago

    Aha, I always thought I smelled a rat on Wikipedia…!

     •  Reply
  20. Thinker
    Sisyphos  over 7 years ago

    Rat rules! The interwebs say so, so it must be so!

    (Cartoon-Boy made me say that.)

     •  Reply
  21. Missing large
    Timothy Madigan Premium Member over 7 years ago

    My favorite of these was a Congressman who, after following back the whole trail of citation, cited himself.. but his original statement was full of caveats and ‘potentially’ that were removed as it passed from story to story.

     •  Reply
  22. 20231014 093035
    ND Cool Z  almost 6 years ago

    Anyone can enter stuff on Wikipedia, but anything unsourced or vandalism would be removed. Not to brag but I’m kind of a professional Wikipedia editor, though some editors don’t see it that way..

     •  Reply
  23. 9be8ad0bd21c8765a6151eec2c1e1bc9 1
    Rat  over 4 years ago

    a

     •  Reply
  24. Large 5135c8dd a681 40c2 8c60 eede9953c411
    Josequeen   over 3 years ago

    Makes sense

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Pearls Before Swine