Recent Comments

1. about 13 years ago on Doonesbury

   The baggie movement is simply a group of people representing the lowest intellect, virtually no education, and a complete lack of knowledge of the world, owned and operated by David and Charles Koch. Their principle goals are to create the largest theoretically possible government (a theocracy) and believe that they deserve the best of all possible government goods and services without having to actually pay a cent for that infrastructure. This personal opinion is based ONLY on 100% of the baggies I have met and spoken with personally over the past 30 years and the nearly 20,000 I have communicated with on line.

2. over 13 years ago on The Meaning of Lila

   The people I’ve met who work on television make a great deal of money. For that kind of money, I would be more than willing to give the American public what it clamors for despite losing all my self respect.

3. over 13 years ago on Last Kiss

   Rather than use the extremely lame, inappropriate, and worthless expression “politically correct”, I advise people to go to a tattoo parlor and the get the word “Moron” tattooed on their forehead in 4 inch high caps so they don’t have to say a word.

4. over 13 years ago on Doonesbury

   Chaos wrote: " You don’t have to believe the Bible version of creation to believe that there was a master design for life and our existence wasn’t just an accident. It takes a lot of faith to believe in evolution. Science is based on the scientific method, as they taught us in junior high. How can you apply it to evolution? "

   It takes no faith whatsoever to understand the INDISPUTABLE FACT of evolution. It only takes a MINIMUM of a third grade education. Smarter students can achieve it with a kindergarten education.

   It is totally impossible to believe in a master design. Christians have been trying to find a justification for a designer for 2000 years. They have failed EVERY SINGLE TIME. They have danced like a jitterbugger on crack but still can’t find rationale to jstuify th existence of a being with aseity. Not to be to hard on them though. The mythical god isn’t powerful enough to overturn the problems with the existence of a being with aseity.

5. over 13 years ago on The Dinette Set

   That explains why Bush got reelected after it was abundantly clear thaty he lied systematically about Afghanistan and Iraq. His own cabinet was on record stating that he lied at that time.

6. over 13 years ago on Doonesbury

   I find it extremely hilarious that open carry (or concealed carry) knuckle draggers actually think they can protect themselves with their firearms.

   Lew wrote: " I wouldn’t carry but if it gives the mugger pause before he tries to rob me "

   Indisputable fact, carrying a firearm does not give pause anymore that the “club” gave car thieves pause.

   An unarmed buddy of mine was beaten near to death by a robber. The robber was caught, he explained to the cops that he assumed my friend was armed hence the rough treatment.

   If I was a robber, I would assume EVERYone was packing. I would cripple them before they could respond so they could not pull their firearm. They wouldn’t know what hit them. It would not give me the slightest hesitation. In fact, I might search their corpse to see if they had a gun that I could sell on the black market.

7. over 13 years ago on Doonesbury

   @fbjsr:

   Would you explain to those of us who are intelligent, educated, knowledgeable what liberals and kumbaya have to do with anything. Is it the opinion of those who drool a billion times more than they think that liberals aren’t in the military?

8. over 13 years ago on Doonesbury

   pschearer wrote: ” And to anyone who uses the word “Progressive” for the Far Left, it was a major coup over a century ago when they redefined progress to mean only movement to socialism. It was almost as big a win as when they changed “liberalism” from advocating limited government and a free market to advocating the welfare state. ”

   People who managed to get beyond the second grade understand the concept of “false dichotomy”. NOTHING is that simple.

   Progressive is someone who wants to move society forward. The opposite of progressive would be regressive, someone who wants to send society BACKWARD.

   The wafer thin line between progressive and regressive is called “status quo”. There is NO ONE ALIVE who is happy with EVERYTHING that is, as it is, so these people DO NOT EXIST.

   You may substitute left for progressive and right for regressive.

   EVERY SINGLE liberal,moderate,conservative, and ultra-conservative BY DEFINITION is a leftist. Only those called reactionaries are right wingers.

   To show you WHY your staggeringly ignorant statement on socialism and the far left is a crock, let’s examine some of those who are on the right have DEEP socialistic roots.

   Evangelicals are right wingers who are socialistic to the core. even the most far left person you can find is not as socialistic. Proof? read Acts 4:32-5. An evangelical’s Constitution is the Bible, and Paul is his god.

   Neocons (named such because Kristol did not want to be confused with conservatives) get their entire methodology from Trotsky. EVERYTHING THEY DO, from fundraising, to pamphleteering comes from his model.

   Baggies (don’t EVER call them members of theTEAPARTY because baggies would have fought against the Sons of Liberty FOR King George as Tories) are simply dishonest evangelicals.

   Finally, the ONLY people who have defined progressives as socialism and liberalism as welfare state are the drooling imbeciles of the right whose COMPLETE lack of education makes it IMPOSSIBLE for them to discuss ANYTHING without creating straw men they can knock down. They are INCAPABLE of winning discussions based on fact or logic.

9. over 13 years ago on Doonesbury

   fbjsr wrote: ” Ever read Mallard Filmore? it’s great. Problem is you can’t get papers to run them ”

   The community I used to live in had a paper that ran Mallard Fillmore. It WAS NOT great.

   The first 2 years it was in the paper, it had the same lame joke EVERY FRICKING DAY. IT wasn’t funny the first time, it wasn’t RELEVANT the first time, it wasn’t even in the same UNIVERSE as reality.

   It was like hearing the same lame knock-knock joke every day for 2 straight years..

10. over 13 years ago on Doonesbury

    garbage wrote: ” Some of you don’t like Fox News because it’s conservative ”

    I’m authentically ultra-conservative. I don’t like Faux Noose at all. It really can’t be considered to be anything since it is merely a mouth piece for the TRILLION DOLLAR RIGHT WING DISINFORMATION MACHINE and, therefore, has nothing whatsoever to do with reality.