If I don’t have a right to be just as well armed as the government, is my right to keep and bear Arms being infringed? Who gets to decide? When push comes to shove, the people who are armed will do the pushing and shoving. (Catch-22 says they have a right to do whatever we can’t stop them from doing. And, implicitly, vice versa.)
Interesting story. Where I live, fire protection is a line-item on my real property tax bill. My insurance company sells me “homeowner’s insurance,” which includes damages resulting from a fire.
Believe it or not, many of the cases the Court decides are done on the basis of rules, regulations, or statutes. The Court doesn’t address constitutional issues unless they have to.
Catch-22 says I’m right.