What makes you think that only 3% of scientist in that field were polled? Who is conducting polls among climate scientists by phoning them? Peer reviewed journals serving that particular discipline are published worldwide, and scientists worldwide have unfettered access and ability to publish countering research. The silly aspect of your position is the assumption that there is some mysterious illuminati style organization that is manipulating the entire science community worldwide to convince a gullible citizenry that fossil fuel consumption is resulting in the world warming up, for no apparent reason. There is a huge sum of dark money being spent to sway the public, but it is coming from the multibillion-dollar energy industry trying to remove any barriers to their continued unfettered profits regardless of the damage it inflicts. Read “The Merchants of Doubt” for documented cases.
Gocomics will not allow links to be posted, but you can figure out what this one science(dot)nasa(dot)gov/climate-change/scientific-consensus/ or just search on scientific consensus on climate change.
First, look up the definition of consensus. There cannot be two opposing positions that both constitute a consensus. Secondly, the fact that the Earth is warming is not in question in the scientific community. What little debate is left is over how much is some natural phenomenon as opposed to human activity.
But it is changing now much faster than it has throughout history. That is the consensus of scientist worldwide, including space agencies that that directly measure it. “naturalnews dot com” and “the national enquirer” are not science journals.
Dear Gocomics, I am NOT going to “stack, stack, stack and save”. This ad blocks my screen constantly. Just typing this short note, I have been interrupted twice. This site is getting unusable due to the pop-up ads. (just happened for the third time).
True. I watched that show when I was a kid, and that was the one danger he never faced. However, he found some way to nearly kill himself almost every week.
I was in 7th grade social studies class. Two guys (students) came in talking about it. This being in Mississippi, where Kennedy was reviled, they were laughing and smiling. Most of us were shocked, and the teacher tried to tone it down and take a serious tone.
What makes you think that only 3% of scientist in that field were polled? Who is conducting polls among climate scientists by phoning them? Peer reviewed journals serving that particular discipline are published worldwide, and scientists worldwide have unfettered access and ability to publish countering research. The silly aspect of your position is the assumption that there is some mysterious illuminati style organization that is manipulating the entire science community worldwide to convince a gullible citizenry that fossil fuel consumption is resulting in the world warming up, for no apparent reason. There is a huge sum of dark money being spent to sway the public, but it is coming from the multibillion-dollar energy industry trying to remove any barriers to their continued unfettered profits regardless of the damage it inflicts. Read “The Merchants of Doubt” for documented cases.