Recent Comments

1. 9 days ago on Doonesbury

   Everybody seems to have forgotten how Reagan “went up in his lines” during his “Shining city on a hill” monologue during the last debate in his 1984 reelection campaign, and rambled-on aimlessly until time ran out. Hardly what would be called articulate.

2. about 1 month ago on Off the Mark

   If she’d have been drinking coffee at the time, it would have come out of her nose!

3. about 1 month ago on Off the Mark

   I had to ask the waitress at Perkins for assurance that the “Krispy Tots” weren’t made from actual little children.

4. about 1 month ago on Speed Bump

   North America’s only marsupial.

5. about 1 month ago on Cornered

   Why don’t you try to stop him and ask?

6. about 2 months ago on Loose Parts

   And our basic “Ignore You” rate will be increase to $2.00 effective immediately.

7. 2 months ago on Get Fuzzy

   Most people were fed up with Trump four years ago; but, like a bad sandwich, he keeps coming up.

8. 2 months ago on Loose Parts

   No; Rock busts right through paper.

9. 2 months ago on Mike du Jour

   And, your political BS is superior, how?

10. 3 months ago on Off the Mark

    Your original post, as well as your followup, was dismissive of the Scientific Method, which includes the stipulation that all hypotheses are subject to reevaluation upon further investigation. You belittled the number of examples of instances in which feathers have been discovered in the fossil record as “a fossil or two,” which carried the implication that this was the only evidence upon which the hypothesis has been made. More basically, you confused hypothesis with theory. The proposition that birds evolved from dinosaurs is presently only a hypothesis; although its validity is supported by findings other than feathers. Your objection appears to have a political basis, rather than a scientific one.