The Buckets by Greg Cravens for September 21, 2016
September 20, 2016
September 22, 2016
Transcript:
There's... Spaghetti on your shirt. Hey! There is. What? It isn't even lunch time yet. Oh, man. Today's not spaghetti day, is it? I hate having the same stuff for breakfast and lunch.
I do 1770s reenacting. Back then one cooked for dinner, the main meal of the day, served 2 pm or 3 pm (ethnic difference in time). Leftovers from same were eaten at supper that night. Leftovers from supper were breakfast the next morning. One might supplement if one had not judged correctly what would be needed or if there was a request from one’s husband or such.
These took care of two matters involved in cooking then that we no longer have.
First, it used up most of the food within 24 hours – no refrigeration so this helped resolve problems with leftovers so that food was eaten before it spoiled.
Second, if you have ever been in a situation in which you have no electricity, you know how hard it is to do simple things such as cooking and cleaning up. Candles were expensive and used to light the task one was doing, so if one was cooking in the dark, one would do it by the firelight and one candle per person working (or less candles). By cooking for 2 pm, one did so when there was the most available light to do so and to do the majority of cleaning up of pots, etc. The clean up after eating late in the day would be easier. In the am one did not have to rise (or one’s servants did not have to rise) as early to start the cooking process.
I always think of this when people think that anything is odd for breakfast. Food is food.
Doctor Toon about 8 years ago
I never was all that picky about what foods had to be eaten at what times, and then I spent 10 years working nights
Waking up in the evening, if my wife made the family spaghetti for dinner then I had spaghetti for breakfast
My digestive system does seem happier now that I’m working days again and eating something closer to normal
car2ner about 8 years ago
lasagna is even better for breakfast
Number Three about 8 years ago
Ah. That explains it.
xxx
Jayneknox about 8 years ago
My most common breakfast is leftover dinner, at least on busy workday mornings.
Today’s was ravioli with a side of coleslaw.
mafastore about 8 years ago
I do 1770s reenacting. Back then one cooked for dinner, the main meal of the day, served 2 pm or 3 pm (ethnic difference in time). Leftovers from same were eaten at supper that night. Leftovers from supper were breakfast the next morning. One might supplement if one had not judged correctly what would be needed or if there was a request from one’s husband or such.
These took care of two matters involved in cooking then that we no longer have.
First, it used up most of the food within 24 hours – no refrigeration so this helped resolve problems with leftovers so that food was eaten before it spoiled.
Second, if you have ever been in a situation in which you have no electricity, you know how hard it is to do simple things such as cooking and cleaning up. Candles were expensive and used to light the task one was doing, so if one was cooking in the dark, one would do it by the firelight and one candle per person working (or less candles). By cooking for 2 pm, one did so when there was the most available light to do so and to do the majority of cleaning up of pots, etc. The clean up after eating late in the day would be easier. In the am one did not have to rise (or one’s servants did not have to rise) as early to start the cooking process.
I always think of this when people think that anything is odd for breakfast. Food is food.