Steve Benson for October 25, 2013

  1. Cowboyonhorse2
    Gypsy8  over 10 years ago

    Its the values the NRA teaches that are part of the problem. Then when you have the intolerant indiscriminately branding any liberal organization a “hate organization” you know this will continue and the nation has a problem.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    woodwork  over 10 years ago

    wasn’t it Regan (conservative) who did away with the mental health facilities?

     •  Reply
  3. 2192946 misterfantastica
    eugene57  over 10 years ago

    Remember when the population and population density was much less?Remember when whites could kill blacks with impunity?

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    moderateisntleft  over 10 years ago

    The NRA teaches the use of weapons in all conlfict resolution. THAT is what the problem is!

     •  Reply
  5. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  over 10 years ago

    When I was in high school, we did have occasional “gang fights”, and the most deadly weapon in use was bike chains, maybe, on rare occasions, someone could show up with a “zip gun”, home-made. There wasn’t easy access to firearms, and their numbers available in “the culture”, was more relative to “need”.

    The NRA is the biggest promoter for the handgun industry of a “need” for handguns, and concealable weapons, that is based on the myth of “terror” and fear, that drives sales.

    While, thanks to the NRA that doesn’t actually pay much attention to rifles or shotgun ownership anymore, the handgun, and “short weapon” (like MACs, and UZI) numbers are “out of the bag”, it doesn’t mean we can’t restore more controls on the increase. The “Brady Bill” was gutted by the simple fact the government cannot keep sales records for over 24 hours, but oddly, the NRA DOES keep those records, to drum up membership!

     •  Reply
  6. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  over 10 years ago

    The NRA is just as neutral as, well, Dick Cheney.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    frodo1008  over 10 years ago

    Yes, let us do away with such as social security and just let some 30 million of the senior citizens of this country (who paid into such a system all their hard working lives) just live in abject poverty until they die in the streets! Would any of you ultra conservatives now patting mskemple on the back be willing to even take care of your own elderly? Please, do not make me throw up, let alone laugh!!

     •  Reply
  8. Marx lennon
    charliekane  over 10 years ago

    Guess you missed the Sox-Cardinals game last night.

     •  Reply
  9. Cowboyonhorse2
    Gypsy8  over 10 years ago

    Neutral might be a stretch.

     •  Reply
  10. Cowboyonhorse2
    Gypsy8  over 10 years ago

    Thanks.

     •  Reply
  11. Cowboyonhorse2
    Gypsy8  over 10 years ago

    What’s your point?

     •  Reply
  12. Cowboyonhorse2
    Gypsy8  over 10 years ago

    Is that an attempt to appear tolerant?

     •  Reply
  13. 200
    Michael Peterson Premium Member over 10 years ago

    Apples are regulated by the FDA to make sure they aren’t toxic. Good thing James Madison didn’t mention them in the Bill of Rights.

     •  Reply
  14. 300px little nemo 1906 02 11 last panel
    lonecat  over 10 years ago

    As a socialist anarchist, I would like to maximize the ability of individuals to live their lives freely within communities. I see complex interactions among various levels, from the individual up to various local social and governmental groups and institutions and beyond to larger scale social and governmental institutions. The kind of socialist anarchism that I advocate tries to develop a comprehensive analysis of the power relationships at all levels; one of the weaknesses of libertarianism, for instance, as a social anarchist would see it, is its obsession with the limitation of government, when there are a lot of other social institutions which can be just as oppressive; at times, government is useful as a countervailing power against the oppressive power of other aspects of society. This sounds very abstract, but socialist anarchism is suspicious of too much abstraction and grows out of the examination of particular problems; it also tries to retain the flexibility to respond to differences rather than making a one-size-fits-all theory. I can get more specific, but this is enough for now.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Steve Benson