Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for March 13, 2014

  1. Young wmb
    wmbrainiac  about 10 years ago

    in bizarro world

     •  Reply
  2. Me
    SCOTTtheBADGER  about 10 years ago

    Ah, Danae is a true child of the Left!

     •  Reply
  3. 654px red eyed tree frog   litoria chloris edit1
    Superfrog  about 10 years ago

    Of course you don’t want the science, Danae. You’re a child. You can’t handle the truth.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    reatta45  about 10 years ago

    Over the ages people have created many gods… those of today are not quite as exciting as some of the past… But they are Just as believable.If you feel compelled to believe in today’s gods, you will be all set for tomorrows newer And improved gods.

     •  Reply
  5. 11 06 126
    Varnes  about 10 years ago

    MayKitten, me too……

     •  Reply
  6. 11 06 126
    Varnes  about 10 years ago

    But what is this Spring that you speak about?…..It’s 6 degrees in Kazoo….

     •  Reply
  7. Duck1275
    Brass Orchid Premium Member about 10 years ago

    So a goldfish, no matter how smart it is, can never eat the black hole at the center of the galaxy then? Well, that isn’t very satisfying.

     •  Reply
  8. Millionchimps1
    tripwire45  about 10 years ago

    Good luck with that.

     •  Reply
  9. Sp studio  2
    Liam Burns  about 10 years ago

    Being that Danae is, in fact, the center of the world, if not the universe, I’m surprised she hasn’t ordered things so.

     •  Reply
  10. Large tv test pattern  color
    Lyons Group, Inc.  about 10 years ago

    Danae’s father is right. Weather isn’t dictated by a calendar.Spring “starts” on the 20th of March, but it’s God who actuallyknows when it begins, not a date on a calendar.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    wdgnas  about 10 years ago

    paraphrasing donald rumsfeld “the absence of evidence does not mean there is an evidence of absence.”doesn’t pertain to a supreme being, does pertain to nucular weapons in iraq…

     •  Reply
  12. Me 2015
    puddlesplatt  about 10 years ago

    Dear Chap…it just a story, read it and enjoy it put it aside, and get a another nail biter.

     •  Reply
  13. Kea
    KEA  about 10 years ago

    yup, very few agnostic terrorists, mass murderers and radical politicians

     •  Reply
  14. Image
    Lenavid  about 10 years ago

    The problem isn’t that Libs want to change the way things are to the way they ought to be, the problem is they want to do it with other people’s money.

     •  Reply
  15. Weird woman with unhappy face
    MrsSnape  about 10 years ago

    It’s not up to science to prove or disprove the existence of a supernatural deity. It’s up to the people who claim such a being exists to prove it’s existence, something they are unable to do.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    dabugger  about 10 years ago

    Her dad’s right, since does not need the inane and immature intrusion of religion and politics to screw things up; except sometimes somewhere in America.

     •  Reply
  17. Image001
    dogday Premium Member about 10 years ago

    Why does everyone forget that when Jesus was asked what the greatest commandments were, he said FIRST was to love God with your whole mind, your whole heart and your whole soul? Second to that and similar to it was to love your neighbor as yourself.

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    roctor  about 10 years ago

    There is a song called my religion is better than your religion. Very good.

     •  Reply
  19. Warthog
    wndrwrthg  about 10 years ago

    My Gods better than your GodMy Gods better than yoursMy Gods better ’causeHe eats Ken-L-RationMy Gods…oh wait, that should be dog.

     •  Reply
  20. Kernel
    Diane Lee Premium Member about 10 years ago

    The whole system went haywire when Republicans noticed that if they used the same information that everyone else was using, they couldn’t get to the conclusions that they wanted to reach, at least not using any recognizable form of logic. So they invented “think tanks”- organizations with honorable integrity filled sounding names like “Americans for Freedom” or “Heritage Foundation”. These organizations would then produce data that could be used to win any argument necessary. The fact that the data had no validity in the real world wasn’t considered to be relevant to the situation.

     •  Reply
  21. Barnette
    Enoki  about 10 years ago

    Danae should become a government climate “scientist.” It combines the best of all those things: Pre-determined outcomes poising as science taken on religious faith and based on politics….

     •  Reply
  22. 1175703 628288277203175 166978261 n
    Caddy57  about 10 years ago

    Making Danae quiet is that easy? No politics, no religion, she has nothing to say. Why did he wait this long on that?

     •  Reply
  23. Missing large
    luvdafuneez  about 10 years ago

    That’s smog (and according to Ronald Reagan, the trees from that huge forest will just make it worse).

     •  Reply
  24. Hpim0415
    Melekalikimaka  about 10 years ago

    What’s with all the yelling? Why is the American Taliban feel it necessary be constantly yelling? Religion is a private, personal matter, between you and your entity.

     •  Reply
  25. Bgfcvvesve4ipojsr
    Gokie5  about 10 years ago

    You don’t “prove” anything in science. You merely support (or not) the null hypothesis to a greater or lesser degree of freedom. Anyhow, that’s what they taught me in the ’70’s.

     •  Reply
  26. Barnette
    Enoki  about 10 years ago

    Do explain Night-Gaunt how virtually all of the IPCC’s predictions on climate change have been wrong. Or, how the Farmer’s Almanac is more accurate at predicting next year’s weather than the NOAA….It is the Progressive side of this, along with government paid scientists that have been consistently wrong on climate change (aka Gorebal Warming). .The Left’s profit of doom, Al Gore, is a leading example of pseudoscience tainted by politics and taken as truth by his true believers. It’s like tuning into the 700 club… God forbid….And yes, all puns intended.

     •  Reply
  27. Missing large
    dflak  about 10 years ago

    In other words: I reject your reality and substitute my own.

     •  Reply
  28. Missing large
    watmiwori  about 10 years ago

    I want what I want when I want it, and I want it N O W !!!!!

     •  Reply
  29. Pastor s new candle
    rickray777  about 10 years ago

    Given all the winter storms back East that we’ve had this year, I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised for people there to:Find all the snow finally melting, in May! — only to have it snow again, right there and then on the spot! Oh, well. Same old, same old! Time to get out the old snow shovels again!…

     •  Reply
  30. Duck1275
    Brass Orchid Premium Member about 10 years ago

    “The deserts are increasing in breadth.”As they have been for some time, ever since the Ice Age cooled the Earth. We can easily prove that a lack of available water causes an increase in atmospheric heating, while the availability of water is due to a high incidence of atmospheric water vapor to deposit water as precipitation, and that said water vapor is a better greenhouse gas than the carbon dioxide. The greenhouse effect is not a major player in global warming, though it is a very real effect and scientifically valid in other contexts than global climate change. The climate of the Earth is ruled by the state change of water. Anybody who says otherwise is placing their own belief system above the laws of thermodynamics and calling it a consensus of settled science.But it is probably for your own good. They just want what they want and if they have to yell until they get it, well, that is your fault.

     •  Reply
  31. Missing large
    westny77  about 10 years ago

    Give it a rest will you. Up in Maine the winters linger a little longer. Look at Peyton Place.

     •  Reply
  32. Missing large
    markjoseph125  about 10 years ago

    Very clever; I bet you thought no one would call you on the difference between “proof” and “evidence”.1) There’s no proof that fairies, leprechauns, and bigfoot don’t exist. Is not believing in them then a matter of faith? Like afairyism, aleprechaunism, and abigfootism, atheism is a conclusion drawn from overwhelming evidence, not an “act of faith.”2) Absence of evidence is evidence of absence, at least where evidence is to be expected. There is no evidence for the existence of the western sky god (god, allah, zeus, thor); if he existed, there should be some way of detecting him and/or his actions. Victor Stenger’s book God: The Failed Hypothesis fleshes out this argument; also to be considered is the fact that The Laws Underlying The Physics of Everyday Life Are Completely Understood. The point is not to believe beyond what the evidence indicates. Else, how could you criticize people who believe in a different religion than the one you believe in?3) But, as with most religionists who attempt to equate acceptance of science or the conclusion of atheism with faith, I really do appreciate the way that you implicitly regard faith as inferior to knowledge, facts, and reason. Well done!

     •  Reply
  33. Missing large
    kaystari Premium Member about 10 years ago

    Getting REALLY SICK of you always bashing religion, Wiley,

     •  Reply
  34. Missing large
    water_moon  about 10 years ago

    here! here! Though the radical athists are just as bad. I had a teacher once say politics isn’t a line, it’s more like a donut with a small bite out of it, because the extremes ‘left’ AND ‘right’ end up closer to each other than to the middle."

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur