I don’t have access to Fox News via sat or cable : Is he still nailing the other fella, Brian Williams? Or has he decided to shut up and hopes it blows over. Which is difficult since he is such a blowhard. I read the account of his former co-workers describing the encounter with an L.A. resident in the aftermath of the ‘92 riots.
"Bill O’Reilly’s LA riots ‘bombardment’ stories disputed by former colleagues"
And then the Falklands war coverage, the El Salvador war coverage…The man does brings a smile to my face, and loud derisive laughter. Sadly, I doubt this will dent his popularity. He caters for the stupid.
“Many who work at Fox are New York liberals” -You’re kidding, right? Is that sarcasm (because it does a mach-three fly-by to me, sometimes…)? Jus’ askin.
Liberals have no, absolutely no justification for ANY outrage at lies..I’m old enough to remember Bill “Benevolent rapist” Clinton lying under oath and the ENTIRE LEFT WING defending their messiah and not holding one single member of their lap dog media accountable for spreading the lie “it’s about sex”.
“^ That was pretty harsh….”.…but true. I remember that time VERY well. As a musician there was something I noticed, was cadence. When anyone said “it’s about sex”, it was always said the same way, same cadence, the same rhythm. It was a blatant affront to the intention of “the 4th estate”..I was raised Democrat but was a Republican when this all happened, but part of me still had that romantic notion about the Democratic party, and it was shattered during Clinton’s term. When the lapdogs collectively looked the other way when the rape allegations surfaced was the final straw for me.
feverjr Premium Member about 9 years ago
The Oh Really? Factor….
braindead Premium Member about 9 years ago
Lying by a Republican isn’t really lying. It’s truthiness.
OmqR-IV.0 about 9 years ago
I don’t have access to Fox News via sat or cable : Is he still nailing the other fella, Brian Williams? Or has he decided to shut up and hopes it blows over. Which is difficult since he is such a blowhard. I read the account of his former co-workers describing the encounter with an L.A. resident in the aftermath of the ‘92 riots.
"Bill O’Reilly’s LA riots ‘bombardment’ stories disputed by former colleagues"
And then the Falklands war coverage, the El Salvador war coverage…The man does brings a smile to my face, and loud derisive laughter. Sadly, I doubt this will dent his popularity. He caters for the stupid.
braindead Premium Member about 9 years ago
denis, thanks very much for providing a perfect example of truthiness.-And thanks to Dlee for the fuller explanation of truthiness.
luvdafuneez about 9 years ago
“Many who work at Fox are New York liberals” -You’re kidding, right? Is that sarcasm (because it does a mach-three fly-by to me, sometimes…)? Jus’ askin.
echoraven about 9 years ago
Liberals have no, absolutely no justification for ANY outrage at lies..I’m old enough to remember Bill “Benevolent rapist” Clinton lying under oath and the ENTIRE LEFT WING defending their messiah and not holding one single member of their lap dog media accountable for spreading the lie “it’s about sex”.
echoraven about 9 years ago
“^ That was pretty harsh….”.…but true. I remember that time VERY well. As a musician there was something I noticed, was cadence. When anyone said “it’s about sex”, it was always said the same way, same cadence, the same rhythm. It was a blatant affront to the intention of “the 4th estate”..I was raised Democrat but was a Republican when this all happened, but part of me still had that romantic notion about the Democratic party, and it was shattered during Clinton’s term. When the lapdogs collectively looked the other way when the rape allegations surfaced was the final straw for me.