Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for March 03, 2011

  1. Comic face
    comicgos  about 13 years ago

    That looks like a “stacked deck”!

     •  Reply
  2. Carnac
    AKHenderson Premium Member about 13 years ago

    It could be worse - the jurors could be vultures.

     •  Reply
  3. Cat29
    x_Tech  about 13 years ago

    If that’s a jury of his peers

     •  Reply
  4. B3b2b771 4dd5 4067 bfef 5ade241cb8c2
    cdward  about 13 years ago

    This IS the best case scenario.

     •  Reply
  5. 008 6
    Elaine Rosco Premium Member about 13 years ago

    Looks like the death penalty to me

     •  Reply
  6. Warthog
    wndrwrthg  about 13 years ago

    I guess there’s no chance of counting on the mercy of the court.

     •  Reply
  7. What has been seen t1
    lewisbower  about 13 years ago

    Always look on the bright side of life.

     •  Reply
  8. Madkanga
    madKanga  about 13 years ago

    Looks like he will meet some of the jurors - once the sentence is executed

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    1OldDude  about 13 years ago

    I seem to remember being in that courtroom during my divorce, I survived. =) Good morning Fish Stix: what is “Obamacare”?

     •  Reply
  10. Monty avatar
    steverinoCT  about 13 years ago

    @1OldDude–

    Perhaps he’s thinking of Gov. Brewer of AZ who cut funds for transplants; one guy was being prepped for surgery until the state Death Panel yanked the money. Actual people really died; the savings would have come to about a million bucks.

     •  Reply
  11. 11 06 126
    Varnes  about 13 years ago

    Where are the lopsided scales of Justice, held up by the lady that is peeking through here blindfold?

     •  Reply
  12. V  9
    freeholder1  about 13 years ago

    When the trial ended the accused gave a scythe of relief.

     •  Reply
  13. Sour grapes
    odeliasimone  about 13 years ago

    The good news is that the client has a large life insurance policy made out to moi.

     •  Reply
  14. Owls 96
    gjsjr41  about 13 years ago

    What did the defendant do for Pete’s sakes?

     •  Reply
  15. Destiny
    Destiny23  about 13 years ago

    Guillotine AND axe?? That judge isn’t taking any chances!!

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    puddleglum1066  about 13 years ago

    “You can be burned at the stake, or we can chop your head off. Which do you prefer?”

    “Oh, I’ll go with the first choice–a hot stake beats a cold chop any time!”

    Nyuk! Nyuk! Nyuk!

    Re “Obamacare”–it’s interesting that Obama really had rather little to do with the content of the bill. Most of the bill’s most obnoxious content was actually crafted by Max Baucus and the “Blue Dog Democrats” (a “Blue Dog” is a guy who was elected as a Democrat but has political positions closer to those of a Reagan Republican). I guess “Baucus-Care” just didn’t have the same ring.

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    ilsapadu  about 13 years ago

    The media must have gotten hold of his story before the trial.

     •  Reply
  18. Yellow pig small
    bmonk  about 13 years ago

    It’s pretty grim looking–but Daniel Webster escaped the Devil in a similar case, according to Stephen Vincent Benét.

     •  Reply
  19. Pogomarch
    MatureCanadian  about 13 years ago

    I especially like the rope over the judge’s desk. Great detail Wiley, how many ways can you “go”?

     •  Reply
  20. Ngc891 rs 580x527
    alan.gurka  about 13 years ago

    Best case scenario: you get a hung jury. Unfortunately, they hung you.

     •  Reply
  21. Junco
    junco49  about 13 years ago

    The best case he can hope for is that he will be confined to cell in which he has to listen to Sarah explain everything about everything to him 24/7.

    And Thanks puddleglum.

    It’s a meaningless term used only by idiots who don’t know any better and charlatans that are far more power hungry and mendacious than any imagined liberal.

    Unfortunately big bucks are going into commercials that use the term. Fear is a powerful weapon and lies are effective ammunition.

    Sometimes I really wish there was a god that would kick their worthless butts.

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    barbfrost  about 13 years ago

    Guillotine and Axe. Sounds like a Law Firm

     •  Reply
  23. Drfcassowary bigger
    Creniere  about 13 years ago

    Before that, it was Reagan-Care…

     •  Reply
  24. Gentoo penguin colony 1045595 lw
    PenguinQueen  about 13 years ago

    I can think of a few court cases locally that could use a judge and jury like that one.

     •  Reply
  25. Redfoxava
    reynard61  about 13 years ago

    @ ghostkeeper: Minor nit-pick: Sing Sing is a State prison.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sing_Sing

     •  Reply
  26. Hawaii5 0girl
    treered  about 13 years ago

    “…how many ways can you ‘go’?” lol, and Star Trek pops into mind with Spock reciting, death by phaser, death by… and so on and so on…

     •  Reply
  27. Hawaii5 0girl
    treered  about 13 years ago

    and the best “death panel” quip, about how Stephen Hawking wouldn’t stand a snowball’s chance in England…. lol!

     •  Reply
  28. Photo  1
    thirdguy  about 13 years ago

    And if it wasn’t for death panels the Tea Party might not even exist. What a shame that it was born on a lie. Perhaps they should change their news source.

     •  Reply
  29. Avatar
    R0Randy  about 13 years ago

    Thirdguy,

    While there are no doubt people who go to tea parties who object to the death panels, the tea parties are really all about opposing profligate spending, and also opposing spending not authorized by the Constitution.

    So I don’t see how the absence or presence of the perception of death panels would have any effect at all on the existence of the tea parties.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur