The Other Coast by Adrian Raeside for July 07, 2012

  1. Missing large
    bagbalm  almost 12 years ago

    Kitties get a few too.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    siskando2  almost 12 years ago

    Kitties get a LOT – studies have shown(can’t quote actual ones right now) they have a significant impact on bird populations, which is worrying. There are more and more cats – feral ones, and pets – and people don’t think their sweet little kitty could or would catch birds, since they’re well-fed and all. Ha! Of all the cats that go out at all, probably at least 75% of them hunt at least a little. And if just those only caught 1 bird a year – that’s still a major amount. And it’s not just “nature’s way” – since humans are taking over more and more habitat, these are “extra” predators introduced onto the scene. We HAVE to limit our pets’ access to wildlife before many species of (our favourite) birds are extinct – a real “silent spring”. I know this because I have cats, who go out (on a limited basis), and one who DOES hunt very successfully – which I work to curtail. We all have the responsibility to limit this predation, though it isn’t always easy!….(And the snails in trees! OMG – that sounds just horrible!! My sympathies.)

     •  Reply
  3. Micromoe
    moe_the_cat  almost 12 years ago

    They come they go, here in the deep south we’ve had a terrific renaissance in the populations of wild turkeys, cranes, eagles, hawks, and falcons.Meanwhile in the four legged varieties; alligators are actually becoming a nuisance again, bobcats are thriving, red and silver foxes are seen in pairs now, coyotes are a common sight, wolves get spotted occasionally, and there are even reports of panthers popping up.It’s a good era for critters in the wild now, but our cats have to stay in the house most of the time

     •  Reply
  4. Fang
    Chewiek9  almost 12 years ago

    Come to my bathroom window at 5 in the morning. Tweet tweet.

     •  Reply
  5. Brutus 2 copy b jpg
    rush.diana  almost 12 years ago

    Kitties get very few, Audubon Society likes to blame cats for the decimation of songbirds. Cats do catch rodents and many, many of them. Birds are alot harder to catch than rodents. While there are some cats who have mastered the technique of catching birds on the fly the vast majority of their prey is of the rodent variety.

    As an aside, I believe cats should remain indoors for their own safety unless they are “working” farm kitties.

     •  Reply
  6. Totorosmileicon
    kirbey  almost 12 years ago

    awwwwww Koko, I feel the same way too.It is not just pesticides. I read an article (wish I still had it) when the birds in the UK that fly south France and beyond are coming back in smaller numbers each year because of people who shoot them for sport, fun and plain being stupid and cats ! Especially cats let outside in the cities. Cats kill just for fun and enjoyment it is so sad. It was a “wake-up” article.

     •  Reply
  7. Avatar
    Bargrove  almost 12 years ago

    Rachel Carson lives on. It was her bookthat killed DDT.

     •  Reply
  8. Hamchimp
    codedaddy  almost 12 years ago

    I don’t get the joke about “silent spring”. Apparently everyone else does or no one else wants to embarrass themselves by asking for help!

     •  Reply
  9. Me on trikke 2007    05
    pam Miner  almost 12 years ago

    Silent spring was a book by Rachel Carson. She noticed one day that she wasn’t hearing songbirds, when in the past there had been many different songs of birdsShe was curious, and found out the birds had been dying out because they were eating bugs that had been sprayed by pesticides. She was instrumental in getting DDT banned, and other environmental stuff.When some of the pesticides had been banned, slowly the birds made a slow comeback. This kind of thing is still happening , like the oil well fracking is poisoning the drinking water that people use. I saw that water can become a so bad that it will catch fire, just like charcoal starter. The greedy are killing the earth! It can be turned around but not for long.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    mesachie  almost 12 years ago

    But DDT is still in use in many countries around the world. I disagree with you. Is it better to have no insect borne diseases, but to have no pollinators or birds left? That makes no sense.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    pabsfx-comics  almost 12 years ago

    @codedaddy‘Silent Spring’ is the name of the 1962 book by Rachel Carson that incorrectly blamed DDT for the decrease in songbird populations. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silent_Spring

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    connie  almost 12 years ago

    Silent Spring. The first big hit ecology book by Rachel Carson warning us of what was coming. It was what woke us up to the dangers of ddt. And no, ddt is still very bad and should still be banned, although the warming of the earth will make insect borne diseases more prevalent.We have managed to bring some species back by protecting them, witness the discussion about the south, but still, loss of habitat is a big, big problem, and climate change, because of green house gases, is going to be much worse. Already having it’s effect in Africa, the artic and the east coast of the United States (although not so drastically yet as northern Africa where millions are dying from drought).

     •  Reply
  13. Brutus 2 copy b jpg
    rush.diana  almost 12 years ago

    Around here they spray pesticides to kill mosquitoes and thus all the beneficial insects die too. Dragonflies eat many mosquitoes, do you think the poison they shoot out of those guns affects only the mosquitoes?Birds who eat insects consume the poison as well.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From The Other Coast