took me a while to get the homophobic reference phil. actually i wasn’t thinking of the term as an insult myself– it is, in fact what i first heard the “movement” call itself. so i meant nothing else. no i am not homophobic. 40% dems you say? where did you get that figure? simply makes no sense that many dems would find appeal in the tea agenda.
took me a while to get the homophobic reference phil. actually i wasn’t thinking of the term as an insult myself– it is, in fact what i first heard the “movement” call itself. so i meant nothing else. no i am not homophobic. 40% dems you say? where did you get that figure? simply makes no sense that many dems would find appeal in the tea agenda.