La Cucaracha by Lalo Alcaraz for September 23, 2014

  1. B3b2b771 4dd5 4067 bfef 5ade241cb8c2
    cdward  over 10 years ago

    He won’t do anything till after the election because that’s what the Democrats have asked of him. C’mon, this is politics, and sometimes he has to bend to the will of his own party.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    dzw3030  over 10 years ago

    “signs murder orders for drone killings.” The drones kill enemies who have declared war on the US and have attacked us, murdering thousands of civilians. Killing your declared enemy in a war is self defense, not murder.

     •  Reply
  3. Img 20230721 103439220 hdr
    kaffekup   over 10 years ago

    Well, then, they might say mean things about the Democrats who are running for office..Doesn’t Lalo know it’s against the terms of service to misrepresent President Obama?snark

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    echoraven  over 10 years ago

    “- Officially, President Obama will be the best US President since FDR on 2017; unofficially, he already is.”.Are you joking? Trying to be funny?.Fewer people working today than the day he took office; more people on public assistance, higher misery index. Presently he is on par with Jimmy Carter for worst president in modern times..It takes ALOT of controlled substances to think he is a great president, far more to think he’s the “bestest evar!!!”..At most he gets credit for 2 things. One is being hesitant about military action in the middle east. We have little stomach for more war. Second for listening to the American people on immigration. Yes it’s a core DNC value; but it not aligning with a economically still suffering country so he is right in listening to the majority of the country.

     •  Reply
  5. Qc1
    agrestic  over 10 years ago

    Awww, look who’s back? And in fine form as always!

    note: ALL CAPS IS MY PERSONAL EXPRESSION.

    And they suit you so well, indie! They’re like a window into your soul.

    _ this was as a direct result of what happened under the Bush administration. STILL BLAMING OTHERS, EH ? – HOW LONG BEFORE YOU RUN THAT COURSE?_

    So I’m assuming you don’t think the financial collapse led to sustained job loss? Well, then I suppose it was nothing to worry about after all. Or maybe economists and historians actually know what they’re talking about. Couldn’t be that, could it?

    A REPUBLICAN CONGRESS PRESIDED DURING CLINTON’S SO-CALLED ECONOMIC RECORD HIGH GROWTH.

    The Republicans in Congress during Clinton were not obstructionist in the way they have been while Obama’s been in office. Clinton also didn’t have to deal with a large financial crash happening pretty much right as he was taking office. And other than Obama’s first two years in office, the economy has been steadily growing.

    HOW COME BUSH IS BLAMED FOR HIS WATCH, BUT YOU DON’T DO THAT FOR OBAMA?

    What should I be blaming Obama for in this conversation? The collapse of Lehman Brothers and near-collapse of the global banking system? Sorry, that all happened while Bush was in office. Unless you think Senator Obama somehow masterminded the whole thing before he even got elected President? If so, huzzah for your active imagination!

    THAT’S NOT REALLY A QUALITATIVE (OR QUANTITATIVE) COMMENT – IT’S JUST BECAUSE YOU SAY SO. AND RATHER BELLIGERENTLY.

    What do I care if you tell me it’s not a qualitative (which it most definitely is) or quantitative (which it is not, but we could back it up quantitatively if we wanted to) comment? Particularly when your whole business in these forums is to engage in fact-free blithering? Okay, I care in that it’s quite comic, and a little bit humiliating for you.

    But hey, at least echo tried to play a pair of twos. Looks like you’re trying to sit at the table without any cards in your hand at all.

     •  Reply
  6. Qc1
    agrestic  over 10 years ago

    IMPLYING THAT ANYONE ELSE’S OPINION IS VALUELESS.

    See, while you’re engaging in opinion, in my reply to echo I was engaging with facts. They might be a foreign concept for you. If so, I invite you to consult one of those dictionaries you’re so fond of trotting out every now and again.

    WHO SAYS I WAS ADDRESSING AGRESTIC?

    Um, you did, unless “THAT’S NOT REALLY A QUALITATIVE (OR QUANTITATIVE) COMMENT – IT’S JUST BECAUSE YOU SAY SO. AND RATHER BELLIGERENTLY” was somehow not in reply to the quote you so helpfully placed directly above your shouting, said quote belonging to a certain commentator called agrestic. Really, indie, sometimes I get the feeling you’re trying to rub two neurons together but keep missing.

    AGRESTIC PLACES IMPORTANCE ON SPARRING WITH ME.

    I don’t place importance on it. I simply find it entertaining. You’re just so easy to nudge into high dudgeon. Just, like, a little tiny poke with a pinky finger and away you go!

     •  Reply
  7. Qc1
    agrestic  over 10 years ago

    Really, indie, sometimes I get the feeling you’re trying to rub two neurons together but keep missing.I DON’T KNOW HOW TO DO THAT

    Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! That pretty well sums it up, doesn’t it?

     •  Reply
  8. Qc1
    agrestic  over 10 years ago

    If you don’t know how to rub two neurons together already, I’m afraid that it would be impossible to explain it to you. Like, literally impossible.

     •  Reply
  9. Qc1
    agrestic  over 10 years ago

    No the drones are used on those that might be enemies.

    It’s the Judge Dredd school of justice. Accused, tried, and executed all in one fell swoop.

     •  Reply
  10. Qc1
    agrestic  over 10 years ago

    f you don’t know how to rub two neurons together already, I’m afraid that it would be impossible to explain it to you. Like, literally impossible.” …AGRESTIC IS TAKING A DIG BECAUSE I CAN’T DO SOMETHING, THEN AGRESTIC COPS OUT AND WON’T EXPLAIN IT?

    Geez, indie, it means to think. And you have reiterated at least three times so far that you don’t know how to do it. Your words, not mine. I’d say that it’s really easy to look up, but since you’ve said you don’t actually know how to rub two neurons together, I imagine this would be lost on you. So sad. But also so hilarious.

     •  Reply
  11. Qc1
    agrestic  over 10 years ago

    I don’t get why everyone is hung up on the use of caps.It’s as if many want everyone to conform, just like the Nazis did.

    indie goes Godwin’s law on objections to all caps—outstanding! There may be hope of making you a funnyman yet!

     •  Reply
  12. Qc1
    agrestic  over 10 years ago

    Awww, indie’s got his knickers in a knot. (Oops, another figure of speech! What? “Figure of speech” is itself a figure of speech? Well, I guess it’s figures of speech all the way down! Dangit, there’s another one…) Anyway, there is strong evidence that the entire nervous system is involved in thinking, emotions, etc. So, um, I’m still being accurate—even more accurate than a fairly well-known figure of speech demands.

    It’s precious how much you play to an imagined audience, laying out your projections for all to see. You do seem to have an inflated sense of what folks think of you (or of me, for that matter). Is this a result of mania? It’s too bad that what comes out is just streams of rage. And hey, if you’ve decided I’m to be your target, then I’m going to continue to have fun tweaking that rage.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    LOWRIDER84  about 10 years ago

    History will blame him for destroying our healthcare system, creating a permanent parasite class, flooding the country with disease-ridden Hispanic peasants and encouraging the spread of Islamic barbarians.Oh, yeah.Great President.Now, get up off of your knees.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From La Cucaracha