Frazz by Jef Mallett for April 21, 2015

  1. Missing large
    jnik23260  over 9 years ago

    Too much “Star Wars”, they watched.

     •  Reply
  2. Thumb dr strange
    LeoAutodidact  over 9 years ago

    Yoda-speak they are stuck in!

     •  Reply
  3. Ted4th
    seismic-2 Premium Member over 9 years ago

    Fusing, this punchline is con-.

     •  Reply
  4. Vote 4 nobody button
    Mr Nobody  over 9 years ago

    This is the kind of convoluted speaking up with which I will not put.

     •  Reply
  5. Sunshine   copy
    SusanSunshine Premium Member over 9 years ago

    I’d think Frazz’s line would be “understand me, mis-, you did.”,,,, which I like anyway, cos it serves for a pun….

     •  Reply
  6. Theskulker avatar ic07
    TheSkulker  over 9 years ago

    Didn’t do well in math did you?

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    Samrhoads Premium Member over 9 years ago

    Richard Russell: the punchline is “yeah, right”.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    peter  over 9 years ago

    > How do you get a negative times a negative > equal a positive? You can’t.

    Aaaand the universe folds and ceases to exist.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    R.U. Kidding  over 9 years ago

    Two wrongs don’t make a right, but two Wrights make an airplane.

     •  Reply
  10. Avatar
    larryvanover  over 9 years ago

    I guess I’m missing the joke? A negative times a negative is always a positive. -2 x -2 = 4 -2 + -2 = -4

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    Steve Savage Premium Member over 9 years ago

    You think Yoda stops teaching, just because his student does not want to hear? A teacher Yoda is.

    - Yoda

     •  Reply
  12. Th calvin464
    pshapley Premium Member over 9 years ago

    There’s a linguistics professor who starts her lectures about word order in different languages with a screenshot of Yoda. It really works in getting the students’ attention, and the examples are easier to follow than awkward translations of Chinese or whatever.

     •  Reply
  13. 0584 l
    1MadHat Premium Member over 9 years ago

    " @comicsssfanWho would ever pay attention to a comment from a product of your school system?Get serious; did you learn something … or not?".He did. Somehow, you might not have. .Or were you not completely ‘there’ in your math class?

     •  Reply
  14. 0584 l
    1MadHat Premium Member over 9 years ago

    All of them. When you look at a phase diagram, plotting temperature against pressure, three regions are shown, describing the limits for gas, liquid & solid. There is a line that shows the boundary between liquid and solid at various pressures. “Freezing point” is where something can be in either state, adding or subtracting energy at that pressure will take it away from that line. In your freezer, take a look at a partly frozen ice cube. It’s all at the same temperature, bit some is frozen and some not. It takes energy to convert from a solid to a liquid, but it is all at the "freezing point. All elements do this, and most compounds.

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    ERNesbitt  over 9 years ago

    When dealing with algebra, my math teacher never let us say -x as “negative x”, it was always “the opposite of x”. Because, X might be a negative number, and -(-2) would be the opposite of negative 2 = positive 2. It also helps to think of it as its own operator (like * or +) that automatically changes the sign. Since you can multiply in any order: -2*-2 is the same as "the opposite of the opposite (double negative) of 2*2. Finally, 2*2=4. The opposite of that is -4, and the opposite of that is 4. Two negatives multiplied become positive.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    hippogriff  over 9 years ago

    The right to freedom of religion to destroy the rights of others is negative.

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    jkstill  over 9 years ago

    If you have MS windows, run this in the calculator:(0-1) * (0-1)

     •  Reply
  18. Vote 4 nobody button
    Mr Nobody  over 9 years ago

    If anyone is interested, here is a simple algebraic proof that a negative times a negative is positive:

    Let a and b be any two real numbers. Consider the number x defined by

    x = ab + (-a)(b) + (-a)(-b).

    We can write

    x = ab + (-a)[ (b) + (-b) ] (factor out -a)= ab + (-a)(0)= ab + 0= ab.

    Also,

    x = [ a + (-a) ]b + (-a)(-b) (factor out b)= 0 * b + (-a)(-b)= 0 + (-a)(-b)= (-a)(-b).

    So we havex = ab

    andx = (-a)(-b)

    Hence, by the transitivity of equality, we haveab = (-a)(-b)

    from http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/EMAT6680/Brown/6690/negneg.htm

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Frazz