I’ve heard reports that juries in trials are often surprised that there is no deluge of scientific evidence a la CSI et al. They almost seem to expect it and are disappointed when it’s not given. If it’s like that on TV it must be like that in life.
On those shows they find a suspect and prove him innocent, then move to another. They go through several before getting the one they can not find innocent, thus proving his guilt. In real life they find a suspect and nail him. The real trial comes in the penalty phase where they test political correctness and public feedback on the internet.
Observer fo Irony over 9 years ago
Evidence verified by a bunch of actors pretending to be forensics specialists are not admissible, period.
derdave969 over 9 years ago
I’ve heard reports that juries in trials are often surprised that there is no deluge of scientific evidence a la CSI et al. They almost seem to expect it and are disappointed when it’s not given. If it’s like that on TV it must be like that in life.
whiteheron over 9 years ago
Well, their medical consultant is not a doctor, but he plays one on TV.
soledadbianca over 9 years ago
all right, where did he go to law school?
MontanaLady over 9 years ago
Where is Hercule Poirot when you need him!
jocatric over 9 years ago
This would be funny if it weren’t the truth
beekaay over 9 years ago
On those shows they find a suspect and prove him innocent, then move to another. They go through several before getting the one they can not find innocent, thus proving his guilt. In real life they find a suspect and nail him. The real trial comes in the penalty phase where they test political correctness and public feedback on the internet.
neverenoughgold over 9 years ago
Perry Mason circa 2015?
GROG Premium Member over 9 years ago
Who cares about them. They’re not the real deal anyway.
Shikamoo Premium Member over 9 years ago
Where is Perry Mason when you need him?“Murder, she wrote. "