Looks Good on Paper by Dan Collins for November 19, 2015

  1. Mainavatar
    Leroy  about 9 years ago

    Clever!

     •  Reply
  2. The shadow
    Ubintold  about 9 years ago

    Holy smokes.

     •  Reply
  3. Black lion
    PICTO  about 9 years ago

    The death rate for smokers is the same asit is for non-smokers…one per person…

     •  Reply
  4. 1017207 10200214106421862 492754112 n
    Cameron1988 Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    yep

     •  Reply
  5. Avatar
    neverenoughgold  almost 9 years ago

    Trying to make a point, are we Dan?

     •  Reply
  6. Meebay149x149
    Dan Collins creator almost 9 years ago

    You can see the original date this was published in the Delaware Gazette. A couple years later Ed Koren did the same gag in the New Yorker and Rick Detorie did a One Big Happy strip with the same gag. It happens!

     •  Reply
  7. Nogodallowed
    Corpse Horn Light Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    You could’ve labeled it “knew the risks” and “sanctimonious jerks” and been accurate, too. (I used to smoke. I violently disapprove of haranguing others in any way, shape, or form.)

     •  Reply
  8. Avatar
    neverenoughgold  almost 9 years ago

    Jeffrey Wigand: Part of the reason I’m here is that I felt that their representations clearly misstated – at least within Brown and Williamson’s misrepresentations – clearly misstated what is common language within the company: “We are in the nicotine delivery business.”

    Mike Wallace: And that’s what cigarettes are for.

    Jeffrey Wigand: A delivery device for nicotine.

    Mike Wallace: A delivery device for nicotine. Put it in your mouth, light it up, and you’re gonna get your fix.

    Jeffrey Wigand: You’re gonna get your fix.

    Mike Wallace: You’re saying that Brown and Williamson manipulates and adjusts the nicotine fix not by artificially adding nicotine but by enhancing the effect of nicotine through the use of elements such as ammonia?

    Jeffrey Wigand: The process is known as “impact boosting”. While not spiking nicotine, they clearly manipulate it. There was extensive use of this technology known as “ammonia chemistry”. It allows for the nicotine to be more rapidly absorbed in the lung and therefore affect the brain and central nervous system. The straw that broke the camel’s back for me, and really put me in trouble with Sandefur, was a compound called coumarin. When I came on board at B. and W., they had tried the transition from coumarin to a similar flavor that would give the same taste, and had been unsuccessful. I wanted out immediately. I was told that it could affect sales, so I should mind my own business. I constructed a memo to Mr. Sandefur indicating I could not in conscience continue with coumarin, a product we now know and we had documentation was similar to coumarin, a lung-specific carcinogen.

    Mike Wallace: And you sent the documents to Sandefur?

    Jeffrey Wigand: I sent the documents forward to Sandefur. I was told that we would continue to work on a substitute but we weren’t going to remove it as it would impact sales, and that was his decision.

    Mike Wallace: In other words, you were charging Sandefur and Brown and Williamson with ignoring health considerations consciously?

    Jeffrey Wigand: Most certainly.

     •  Reply
  9. Ironbde
    Carl  Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    Funny I thought the nonsmokers died at the same rate as smokers, 100%.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Looks Good on Paper