Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for November 06, 2015

  1. Missing large
    Argythree  about 9 years ago

    Danae has found her destiny…

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    dkendraf  about 9 years ago

    Considering that eating SOME chocolate daily is actually proven, it lends some truth in the midst of all that “tailoring.”

     •  Reply
  3. Scott joplin
    Ragtime78rpm  about 9 years ago

    I just saw a study on how healthful dark chocolate is. Since I happen to really like the stuff, I’m inclined to agree…

     •  Reply
  4. Order and chaos
    RogueLeader  about 9 years ago

    “Truthiness”

     •  Reply
  5. Oldwolfcookoff
    The Old Wolf  about 9 years ago

    And thus was born every nutritional company under the sun…

     •  Reply
  6. Millionchimps1
    tripwire45  about 9 years ago

    News media science reports.

     •  Reply
  7. Duck1275
    Brass Orchid Premium Member about 9 years ago

    Facts are too convenient. If you want something useful, you have to be willing to take a block of statistical data and carefully pare away anything that doesn’t look like a duck. Given enough data, you can prove that water flows uphill and that an inflated currency means more money for everybody.

     •  Reply
  8. Out little avatar
    dadoctah  about 9 years ago

    I’d rather see a study that says kale is life-threatening.

     •  Reply
  9. 3dflags usaal1 5
    Alabama Al  about 9 years ago

    I call it something else.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    uniquename  about 9 years ago

    She could join the firm at Doonesbury that does this.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    Pointspread  about 9 years ago

    But what does Lucy get out of this?

     •  Reply
  12. Mr haney
    NeedaChuckle Premium Member about 9 years ago

    Faux News has been doing this for years. I don’t see what’s new.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    1953Baby  about 9 years ago

    I NEVER thought I’d say this, but, Danae, if you can drum one up about chocolate, how about chocolate derivatives such as Tootsie Rolls. . .I can’t live without my daily ration of TR. . .

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    Beleck3  about 9 years ago

    now where would all these “lying liars” be without their own “truthiness.” such a world of Faux Noise and their “followers.”

     •  Reply
  15. Celtic tree of life
    mourdac Premium Member about 9 years ago

    My fave – trickle down economics.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    Billll  about 9 years ago

    A good marketeer will have 2 sets of studies, one supporting each side of every issue.

     •  Reply
  17. Pirate63
    Linguist  about 9 years ago

    A facsimile of factualism and fictitious but fascinating factoids, backed by facetious fulminations and fraudulent figures

    Definition of Faux News

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    dabugger  about 9 years ago

    Whatever Danae and Lucy have going, they had better have that nasty business bureaucratic permit and all that goes with economic progress. Or are we still in the ‘lemonade’ stand phase yet? Oops, getting ahead. . .

     •  Reply
  19. 1682106 inline inline 2 mel brooks master
    Can't Sleep  about 9 years ago

    That kid’ll be rich by the end of the election cycle.Oh, wait – these days it never ends.Yeah, she’ll be rich.

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    3pibgorn9  about 9 years ago

    Facts tailored while you wait.

     •  Reply
  21. Peam thumb
    Peam Premium Member about 9 years ago

    “Just the facts, ma’am!” Pace Dragnet and Freberg.

     •  Reply
  22. Boston
    MS72  about 9 years ago

    You know that name-calling discredits your argument.

     •  Reply
  23. Missing large
    roberta.star.hirshson  about 9 years ago

    Danae is the Lucy of the 21st century. (Remember Peanuts?)

     •  Reply
  24. Missing large
    dflak  about 9 years ago

    “Tailored Facts” – I like that. I’ll put that right next to: “I reject your reality and substitute my own.”

     •  Reply
  25. Missing large
    phoenixnyc  about 9 years ago

    “You mustn’t eat candy, Mister Whiteside! It’s very bad for you!”.“My great-aunt Jennifer ate a box of candy every day of her life. She lived to be 102, and when she had been dead for three days, she still looked better than you do now!”—Sheridan Whiteside (via Moss Hart), The Man Who Came To Dinner

     •  Reply
  26. Missing large
    38lowell  about 9 years ago

    Danae is not alone!

     •  Reply
  27. Missing large
    wherehaveallthetalentedartistsgone  about 9 years ago

    She’s being sought by the Hillary campaign. “We’ve got studies! We’re not just spin anymore”!

     •  Reply
  28. Image
    peter0423  about 9 years ago

    “You’re entitled to your own opinion. You’re not entitled to your own facts. — Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan, RIP

    Lost in all of this is the notion that there IS such a thing as the truth, that there IS such a thing as objective reality. I don’t think there’s ever been a society in human history — until ours! — in which that notion has been seriously, systematically rejected by anyone but infants and psychotics. Frankly, this frightens me.

     •  Reply
  29. Duck1275
    Brass Orchid Premium Member about 9 years ago

    “You can “prove” it as long as your colleges don’t demolish it.”-What one collective says must be given credence above what another collective says? That is an interesting assumption. One needs to have faith in their chosen collective then I would presume?

     •  Reply
  30. Duck1275
    Brass Orchid Premium Member about 9 years ago

    Yes. That is true. And what happens if they don’t? Does the process to which humans are contributing slow down or reverse? Do the seas begin to go down and fresh water become more available? Do the glaciers stop melting and the deserts stop growing?If not, then why not. And what will change the climate trend that is evident over the past ten to fifteen thousand years?Take your time. Reality will still be here long after the Climate Doomsday folks and their children’s, children’s children have all gone to their non-denominational, generic lack of an afterlife.

     •  Reply
  31. J money
    Joseph Krois  about 9 years ago

    Danae’s ripping off an often used Doonesbury story line. But then again she could provide herself with a study that shows she isn’t.

     •  Reply
  32. Computerhead
    Spyderred  about 9 years ago

    Fine and widely used by the Republicans and their supporters to discredit (among their flock) real science. But that’s the real problem. It takes research (and time) to separate the sheep from the goats, so that in the 24-hour instant news cycle there’s not even an attempt to do it, and consumers, who must devote increasing amounts to energy to survival, can’t. The result is that some people believe that Egypt’s pyramids were really grain storage units built by Joseph.

     •  Reply
  33. Dr suese 02
    Tarredandfeathered  about 9 years ago

    The latest in the Global Warming Consequences are the “Blowholes” appearing in Siberia..The Opposite of Sinkholes.It turns out that there are some rather large Methane Deposits trapped under the Ice. When the Permafrost begins to Melt, the Methane is under so much Pressure that it Literally Explodes out of the ground leaving behind some Very Impressive Craters.They were first mistaken for Meteorite craters until scientists noted that they were Blown Out from Underground pressure..

     •  Reply
  34. P 3loaded
    SkyGuy65  about 9 years ago

    Tailored facts = liberal agenda. You know; global warming, the improving economy, unemployment rates, gun control stats, etc.

     •  Reply
  35. Missing large
    markjoseph125  about 9 years ago

    But selling all they own and giving it to the poor does.

     •  Reply
  36. Img 20230721 103439220 hdr
    kaffekup   about 9 years ago

    They will keep up their misinformed jabber no matter what anyone says to the contrary. It’s all they have. I have a good friend I used to argue with until I realized that, no matter what I said, he kept repeating the same position. He didn’t even try to refute what I said. Now if he starts I just look at him.

     •  Reply
  37. Missing large
    markjoseph125  about 9 years ago

    Ask, and you shall receive.In response to Jim in CT, who asked why creationists used technology, given that they don’t believe in science, you responded, “Using such things doesn’t violate their religion.” To which I appended, “But selling all they own and giving it to the poor does (violate their religion, that is)”. The admittedly sarcastic point being that the crazies pick and choose from their big book of magic myths, focusing on what they like and what applies to other people, for example, the anti-homosexuality statements, and ignoring what they don’t like or what applies to them. My reference was to Luke 14.33, where Jesus says explicitly, “In the same way, those of you who do not give up everything you have cannot be my disciples.”

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur