For Better or For Worse by Lynn Johnston for January 31, 2016

  1. B986e866 14d0 4607 bdb4 5d76d7b56ddb
    Templo S.U.D.  almost 9 years ago

    Nice improvising. (As for the second panel, of course Lizard-breath hate the nose. Building snow-people is hungry work.)

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    legaleagle48  almost 9 years ago

    Hey, whatever works!

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    CO Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    They could have just had a snowman laying down. :-)

     •  Reply
  4. Img john pepp
    Strider Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    A cartoonist who doesn’t know how to build a snowman…tsk tsk. YOU BUILD A RAMP TO PUT THE SNOWMAN TOGETHER, then you simply remove the ramp. ;)

     •  Reply
  5. Picture 001
    rshive  almost 9 years ago

    The artistic vision often exceeds capabilities for building snowmen.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    Chris Kenworthy  almost 9 years ago

    She actually ate a veggie? ;)

     •  Reply
  7. 2b48ee4d05cdcf7f1280fb2d23a2b3da 1
    puggles  almost 9 years ago

    I had a neighbor who would pack snow into a rough block-like pillar and carve beautiful sculptures therefrom. In a nice, snowy winter he would end up with a front yard full of artwork that melted each spring.

     •  Reply
  8. Balloon32
    freewaydog  almost 9 years ago

    Who’s the 3rd kid?

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    crazyliberal  almost 9 years ago

    I believe the little boy next door. Can’t recall his name but he eventually gets a little brother named Baby Richard.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    Bakkie  almost 9 years ago

    And the third kid’s name is Calvin, right?

     •  Reply
  11. 8487d5805da9012ee3bf00163e41dd5bfunny
    summerdog86  almost 9 years ago

    Someone must have made another fridge raid for 2 more carrots.

     •  Reply
  12. Willy wonka factory
    dsom8  almost 9 years ago

    The one on the left is just right.

     •  Reply
  13. G
    mrgromit  almost 9 years ago

    Canadian kids know what “1000 lbs” means? I assumed it would have been kilos, or maybe ’tonne.’

     •  Reply
  14. Image
    Alphaomega  almost 9 years ago

    Not to be too anal retentive,a Canadian gallon consists of 4. 40oz quarts,and a U.S. gallon has 4- 32 oz quarts,hence 5 U.S. quarts would be equal to 4 Canadian quarts ,or 1 imperial gallon.Of course nowadays we use litres which is about 35 fluid oz.

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    hippogriff  almost 9 years ago

    3 Fighting FishThings were confusing enough back then, as grocers were none to clear about whose measures were being used. Quart, from quarter, four to the gallon. Strangely everyone agreed when I suggested a new quart, half way between, but were outraged at the idea it should be called a litre.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    USN1977  almost 9 years ago

    A lot of newspapers edit out the first two panels of Sunday strips for unknown reasons. As a result, “throwaway jokes” are often put there, or an extra joke. If during its original run the first two panels got censored, then it would be wordless. However, you are right, showing the entire strip does not make sense to call it a wordless strip.Since Calvin & Hobbes were mentioned, it is worth noting that Bill Watterson despised the newspaper practice of editing out the first two panels, as sometimes he included material germane to the strip. Censoring those threw the plot off the track.

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    Robert Craigs  almost 9 years ago

    The Canadian (Imperial) gallon was the volume of 10 pounds of water. The Americans chose the Wine gallon of Queen Ann (Anne?) which I believe was defined as so many cubic inches. The Canadian gal was 40 fluid ounces and the American gal 32 ounces. I once checked the metric equivalents and was surprised that the American fluid ounce was very slightly bigger than the Canadian fluid ounce.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From For Better or For Worse