Republicans vote against things. Democrats vote for things. We want Sanders – a liberal (gasp!) Commie who will Robin Hood the trickle down. We want Clinton – a smart, able politician who will be the first woman president. The right wing wants ANYONE but Clinton, so they get Trump. Now they want ANYONE but Trump so they look at Cruz, they toy with brokered conventions. They say NO, but they never provide a reasonable solution past NO.
AGAINST BERNIE SANDERS ! Sanders is a reactionary who wants to take this country back to the 1960’s. Not gonna happen. At least Hillary is forward thinking.
Pretty obvious. No good choice except for Bernie Sanders. He was given a big thumbs up by Asher Edelman, an X-wall Street man who likes Sanders plan for finance. He knows that when the top1% are the only ones who have money to spend, they spend on houses, stocks, and other stuff that doesn’t get the money moving (velocity) but when the rest of us can spend money, we spend all or mostly all of it, there by growing the economy and speeding up the exchange of money.When a Wall Street Tycoon sees the sense in Sanders economic plan, that means a whole lot.
superposition about 8 years ago
Both, if there was a “No Suitable Candidate” choice on the ballot!
walkingmancomics about 8 years ago
answer: “yes.”
kennethcwarren64 about 8 years ago
Baby Bush showed that we could, someone else will just take over and run things.
Mr. Blawt about 8 years ago
Republicans vote against things. Democrats vote for things. We want Sanders – a liberal (gasp!) Commie who will Robin Hood the trickle down. We want Clinton – a smart, able politician who will be the first woman president. The right wing wants ANYONE but Clinton, so they get Trump. Now they want ANYONE but Trump so they look at Cruz, they toy with brokered conventions. They say NO, but they never provide a reasonable solution past NO.
WestNYC Premium Member about 8 years ago
AGAINST BERNIE SANDERS ! Sanders is a reactionary who wants to take this country back to the 1960’s. Not gonna happen. At least Hillary is forward thinking.
pam Miner about 8 years ago
Pretty obvious. No good choice except for Bernie Sanders. He was given a big thumbs up by Asher Edelman, an X-wall Street man who likes Sanders plan for finance. He knows that when the top1% are the only ones who have money to spend, they spend on houses, stocks, and other stuff that doesn’t get the money moving (velocity) but when the rest of us can spend money, we spend all or mostly all of it, there by growing the economy and speeding up the exchange of money.When a Wall Street Tycoon sees the sense in Sanders economic plan, that means a whole lot.
superposition about 8 years ago
Would be nice, if we could vote NO EVIL instead of trying to chose the least evil.
PainterArt Premium Member about 8 years ago
Cynical. There are many voters who are voting for those two candidates or they would not being leading.