F Minus by Tony Carrillo for September 11, 2016

  1. B986e866 14d0 4607 bdb4 5d76d7b56ddb
    Templo S.U.D.  about 8 years ago

    “Or utility”?

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    Dr.DocSmith  about 8 years ago

    How many people use a vehicle for “Sport”, well you do have to pay extra for the vehicle, and the insurance, yep. Of course is for utility, it’s a vehicle! duh.

     •  Reply
  3. Avatar 3
    pcolli  about 8 years ago

    He’s used it, therefore he utilised it. The sport bit was avoiding the bad drivers.

     •  Reply
  4. Snoopy
    Pedmar Premium Member about 8 years ago

    I’ve seen SUV drivers swerve into oncoming traffic (me) to avoid manhole covers — manhole covers that are recessed one-quarter of an inch! And yet, the TV commercials show their vehicles driving through rocky streams and over fallen tree trunks.

     •  Reply
  5. Rustfungus2a
    Cerabooge  about 8 years ago

    Why does no one ever object to the oxymoronic nature of the term “sport utility”?

     •  Reply
  6. Self portrait
    JDSmith82 Premium Member about 8 years ago

    Until recently, you’d need a military grade vehicle to navigate the rough roads in my neighborhood! :-P

     •  Reply
  7. Cartooninglady
    I AM CARTOON LADY!  about 8 years ago

    If you are not in the construction business, than there is no reason for an SUV in the city. They are not meant to be family cars. They’re too big and have horrible blind spots. They are hard to park and some are top heavy making it easy to tip over. My small car has nothing but dings and scrapes because of those #@%#! SUV’s!

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From F Minus