The Meaning of Lila by John Forgetta and L.A. Rose for October 31, 2010

  1. Croparcs070707
    rayannina  about 14 years ago

    Now begins the debate on whether an O’Donnell costume or a Nancy Pelosi costume would be scarier … have at it, folks!

     •  Reply
  2. Zoe 6.5 years 5
    pwbritt Premium Member about 14 years ago

    People who criticize O’Donnel or Palin as cretins could not possibly have ever listened tp Maxine Waters, Loretta Sanchez or Patti Murray. Both parties have some really ignorant people in positions of power,

     •  Reply
  3. B3b2b771 4dd5 4067 bfef 5ade241cb8c2
    cdward  about 14 years ago

    ^Which makes us ignorant for electing them. So you want to compound the problem with O’Donnel, who has no idea what she’s talking about?

    BTW, we don’t criticize Palin only for being ignorant but also for being a self-serving, attention-crazed, opportunist who quits her responsibilities to the people the moment she can find a better-paying gig.

     •  Reply
  4. 611kwel
    611Kwel  about 14 years ago

    Annie’s costume makes a mother proud.

     •  Reply
  5. 66c4a5b5 b155 4b58 8ffc f9b65c9a1083
    Wpmsd Premium Member about 14 years ago

    My motto is “Throw the bums out. We want new bums!”

     •  Reply
  6. Exploding human fat bombs hedge 060110
    Charles Brobst Premium Member about 14 years ago

    The scary thing is that the current crop of Republican candidates are either lunatics, bigots or worst of all beholden to foreign corporations looking to outsource more American jobs. If the Republicans win you can kiss your job, your house and any hopes you might have for the future goodbye. The Party of “NO!” has stopped hundreds of good ideas from getting passed and will take away the funding from anything already passed that might help. We are doomed.

     •  Reply
  7. B w catpaw
    joefish25  about 14 years ago

    stupid is as stupid does

     •  Reply
  8. Georg von rosen   oden som vandringsman  1886  odin  the wanderer
    runar  about 14 years ago

    Minor, whatever O’Donnell diddled in wasn’t Wicca. She would not have known Wicca if it bit her on the butt. Wiccans don’t do blood sacrifices and do not acknowledge the existence of Satan.

     •  Reply
  9. United federation
    corzak  about 14 years ago

    It’s not about diversity, RCMinor. It’s about hypocrisy.

     •  Reply
  10. Rhadamanthus
    craigwestlake  about 14 years ago

    Here’s a suggestion for you fellas’

    Starting Monday I will be turning in, not the spammers, but the website business site that they are providing the link for to our state’s attorney-general. He loves to prosecute spamming website owners.

    Do the same for your state’s attorney-general; since go-comics doesn’t wish to help, then we can simply have the spammers owners fined out of existence.

    Also, just the fact that Go-Comics will have government officials monitoring this site and asking questions may help to encourage them to stop the spammers instead of giving them shelter.

     •  Reply
  11. Flash
    pschearer Premium Member about 14 years ago

    I do NOT want anyone to think I’m defending Christine O’Donnell, but in the interests of accuracy, I believe she said she dabbled in “witchcraft”, not wicca. So I guess blood sacrifices are OK.

    But considering her chances of winning are none to less-than-none, her only value is to drive Lefties crazies, as shown by some comments above. (She is cute, though. Playboy, are you listening?)

     •  Reply
  12. Keithmoon
    Wildcard24365  about 14 years ago

    I really do not care that she “dabbled” in witchcraft. I wouldn’t care if she STILL “dabbled” in witchcraft. The things that bother me is her insisting on debating the Constitution without actually READING it, and her policy of sexual repression…

    On the other hand, if she ever cuts loose, WATCH OUT!

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment