Chris Britt for May 07, 2018

  1. Step 1
    mr_sherman Premium Member about 6 years ago

    This will start an argument.

     •  Reply
  2. Img 0048
    Nantucket Premium Member about 6 years ago

    Torture was historically used for “confessions” (we KNOW you did it) and conversions. People will say what the torturer wants o hear to get the pain to stop. Torture is not valuable for reliable information.

     •  Reply
  3. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  about 6 years ago

    American war criminals like GW Bush get away with a lot.

     •  Reply
  4. Desron14
    Masterskrain  about 6 years ago

    STILL Waiting for Chicken-S#!t Hannity to be Waterboarded, as he PROMISED TO DO to “Prove” that it’s “Not Torture!”

     •  Reply
  5. Tumblr mbbz3vrusj1qdlmheo1 250
    Night-Gaunt49[Bozo is Boffo]  about 6 years ago

    And the protectors of such war criminals (Pres. Obama) are just as guilty for doing so as per the Treaty Against Torture.

     •  Reply
  6. Photo
    Hippogriff  about 6 years ago

    Send her to the Hague, not the cabinet

     •  Reply
  7. Reagan ears
    d_legendary1  about 6 years ago

    Am I the only one disturbed by the goon grabbing the prisoner’s package while smiling?

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    wellis1947 Premium Member about 6 years ago

    Contemporary use of “torture” has little to do with the acquisition of information and a lot to do with ‘punishment’ for the holding of “wrong-headed” ideas.

    The “torture” as part of the culture at Abu Ghraib had very little to do with the need for information and a lot to do with hating the people over which we had control.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment