Not a fan of 3D movies. It’s one thing to look at stereoscopic photographs with special glasses to appear to render them in three dimensions. But when I watch a movie I don’t want to have to put anything on to be able to enjoy the movie to it’s fullest.
I have some clip ons to put over my regular glasses for different standards of 3D, but it seems that every time there’s a movie in 3D, it’s not one that I want to watch anyway.
Call me when they have holographic movies ready to go.
I’ve tried watching 3D a couple of times. It gives me a headache. I haven’t tried the so-called “active 3D” glasses though, only the kind that use different colored filters.
When I got my first big screen TV in 2011 I bought a 3D system. Didn’t use it a LOT, but it did work (and it’s not using the RED-BLUE method). Then, a couple of years ago when I got my new glasses I bought the ones I did because they came with 3 filters specifically designed for the frames — yellow, polarized, and 3D. I figured the 3D for these glasses would work better than having to put the 3D glasses over my own.
Then, 2 days later, my TV expired. I had a 5 year warranty — this was year 6.
I have a 55" LG 3-D TV and about 300 3-D movies. I have rarely enjoyed anything as much. People who visit, love to watch and actually beg me to put on the Avengers movies, or any of the theatrical releases I’ve got. I don’t understand why some people don’t like modern 3-d which is without eye-strain, headaches, and doesn’t use blu-green glasses—only light polaroids. The kids love “Wizard of Oz” and all the great animated movies, adults love the adventure/ science fiction-fantasy movies. They are so much more exciting in 3-D—so much more involving than 2-D. If you don’t like it, o.k. for you, but you’re missing some wonderful stuff!
Sadly, 3D movies are much more expensive than the 2D kind. It’s worse if they constantly make use of that “paddleball” effect where they get the audience to jump from objects flying at the camera, and if you watch it on cable TV, you’ll never get that feeling.
JorgeSainz about 6 years ago
3-D has already come back, and you really didn’t even know it
whataboytjiex2 about 6 years ago
Now you can look at the world through red and green tinted glass, eh Snoopy!
knight1192a about 6 years ago
Not a fan of 3D movies. It’s one thing to look at stereoscopic photographs with special glasses to appear to render them in three dimensions. But when I watch a movie I don’t want to have to put anything on to be able to enjoy the movie to it’s fullest.
hangedman about 6 years ago
Good Greif! Holographic Peanuts!
orinoco womble about 6 years ago
It did, too. Only now they call it Imax.
Kaputnik about 6 years ago
I have some clip ons to put over my regular glasses for different standards of 3D, but it seems that every time there’s a movie in 3D, it’s not one that I want to watch anyway.
Call me when they have holographic movies ready to go.
about 6 years ago
I never really liked 3D to begin with.
jagedlo about 6 years ago
what was Linus looking for in the grass before he found the glasses?
Purple People Eater about 6 years ago
I’ve tried watching 3D a couple of times. It gives me a headache. I haven’t tried the so-called “active 3D” glasses though, only the kind that use different colored filters.
Neo Stryder about 6 years ago
But thanx to Nintendo, we have 3D that need no glasses.
DCBakerEsq about 6 years ago
My life is already in 3D. Don’t even need the glasses.
eladee AKA Wally about 6 years ago
Well it’s back. I’ve been less than impressed. We always ask for the 2D. Version whenever possible.
ChessPirate about 6 years ago
Here’s Joe Cool, hanging out, watching the chicks go by… in 3D!
JD'Huntsville'AL about 6 years ago
When I got my first big screen TV in 2011 I bought a 3D system. Didn’t use it a LOT, but it did work (and it’s not using the RED-BLUE method). Then, a couple of years ago when I got my new glasses I bought the ones I did because they came with 3 filters specifically designed for the frames — yellow, polarized, and 3D. I figured the 3D for these glasses would work better than having to put the 3D glasses over my own.
Then, 2 days later, my TV expired. I had a 5 year warranty — this was year 6.
ToonGuy300 about 6 years ago
Actually, it did.
Kind&Kinder about 6 years ago
I have a 55" LG 3-D TV and about 300 3-D movies. I have rarely enjoyed anything as much. People who visit, love to watch and actually beg me to put on the Avengers movies, or any of the theatrical releases I’ve got. I don’t understand why some people don’t like modern 3-d which is without eye-strain, headaches, and doesn’t use blu-green glasses—only light polaroids. The kids love “Wizard of Oz” and all the great animated movies, adults love the adventure/ science fiction-fantasy movies. They are so much more exciting in 3-D—so much more involving than 2-D. If you don’t like it, o.k. for you, but you’re missing some wonderful stuff!
glowing-steak32 about 6 years ago
Sadly, 3D movies are much more expensive than the 2D kind. It’s worse if they constantly make use of that “paddleball” effect where they get the audience to jump from objects flying at the camera, and if you watch it on cable TV, you’ll never get that feeling.