Farcus by David Waisglass and Gordon Coulthart for February 21, 2020

  1. Mm wp001
    allen@home  almost 5 years ago

    I wouldn’t have laid the pipe until he had moved. A long way away.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    derdave969  almost 5 years ago

    And, anyway the plans wanted an expansion joint in another 500 feet.

     •  Reply
  3. Ray comm 2 transparent 0.5x 50
    OldDesertLizard Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    “Gonna” or “going to”. I don’t think “gonna to” works.#nobodyproofreads

     •  Reply
  4. Photo 1501706362039 c06b2d715385
    Zebrastripes  almost 5 years ago

    Pipeline, smipeline….ruining land everywhere….

     •  Reply
  5. 1
    ncorgbl  almost 5 years ago

    ‘Does a pipeline sit in the woods?’

     •  Reply
  6. Louis2
    PoodleGroomer  almost 5 years ago

    Throwing a peanut butter and honey sandwich into the woods would have been easier.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    Old Man River  almost 5 years ago

    That would really mess up the laminar flow. (Sorry about that. Frustrated retired engineer)

     •  Reply
  8. Grand canyon picture
    Ricky Bennett  almost 5 years ago

    When I was stationed in Alaska, I was driving a pickup truck down the Richardson Highway and I met a moose on the road where the Alaska pipeline went under the road. I couldn’t get around him so I honked the horn to try to scare him off. He got mad and started charging my truck. So I had to floor it in reverse to avoid getting rutted. After about a quarter of a mile, he got tired so he ambled off the road, letting me by.

     •  Reply
  9. Britstones
    Boomer Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    Sad when the cartoonist and his editor are both illiterate.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Farcus