Neither is company’s like Americas best advertising 2 pairs of glasses for $69.99 once you add all of what your prescription calls for your closer to $260.
Nah, not likely. Still Caveat Emptor should be used here. If they look at anything else, it’ll be fine. They’ll know it’s the sign, not the eyes. It’s really funny, though. Thanks for the laugh. Good way to start the day.
Speakin’ of ethical: How could a presidential pardon for his indicted/convicted cronies NOT work against Trump once h’s out of office? I. e. "Mr./Ms. X, you are pardoned for anything UP UNTIL NOW. Lie to us from here on & your F_______ ‘in (Fox News-in’) ass is grass!
Also: I asked my bank to find 1500 (missing) $ ’ s in my accounts. They were less than receptive.
RAGs almost 4 years ago
Look sharp, it’s a jungle out there.
kingdiamond69 almost 4 years ago
Neither is company’s like Americas best advertising 2 pairs of glasses for $69.99 once you add all of what your prescription calls for your closer to $260.
Liverlips McCracken Premium Member almost 4 years ago
No.
mddshubby2005 almost 4 years ago
Not only is it unethical, it’s downright short-sighted.
Qiset almost 4 years ago
Shhh! Don’t let Facebook or Youtube learn this.
Gent almost 4 years ago
No. No it’s not.
Saddenedby Premium Member almost 4 years ago
dictionary definition – NO – but the way that ethical is defined in today’s technical/MSM world – who knows?
redback almost 4 years ago
no its not but that’s what all advertising, not just medical, is all about. Remember you are nothing if you don’t buy it
donwalter almost 4 years ago
…I’m a little fuzzy on the concept…
Lee26 Premium Member almost 4 years ago
That’s almost how I see normally, but I still think it is funny. Misery loves company?
Zebrastripes almost 4 years ago
Well, maybe not, but it brings them in…
HunterIsACriminal almost 4 years ago
Better than the cocaine and heroin that restaurants put in the food so you keep coming back for more.
lv2sew almost 4 years ago
In Consumer Ed, I was taught that advertisers create a need, then fill that need. Mission accomplished.
Zen-of-Zinfandel almost 4 years ago
Contact the Eyevengers.
scaeva Premium Member almost 4 years ago
No.
thejanith Premium Member almost 4 years ago
Nah, not likely. Still Caveat Emptor should be used here. If they look at anything else, it’ll be fine. They’ll know it’s the sign, not the eyes. It’s really funny, though. Thanks for the laugh. Good way to start the day.
cuzinron47 almost 4 years ago
It’s pretty easy to see the sign lies.
PaulGoes almost 4 years ago
Should have seen that coming
wsedrel Premium Member almost 4 years ago
Speakin’ of ethical: How could a presidential pardon for his indicted/convicted cronies NOT work against Trump once h’s out of office? I. e. "Mr./Ms. X, you are pardoned for anything UP UNTIL NOW. Lie to us from here on & your F_______ ‘in (Fox News-in’) ass is grass!
Also: I asked my bank to find 1500 (missing) $ ’ s in my accounts. They were less than receptive.
tee929 almost 4 years ago
Maybe offer more “eye candy”……
Shikamoo Premium Member almost 4 years ago
The ethical lines are blurred here.
TPFSA almost 4 years ago
Eye Labs Also