Every day I keeps getting impressed by Foxo Reardon’s incredible talent of expressing a funny with no words.
And one has to especially appreciate the artwork with spectacular perspectives. In each comic he ensures three dimensional depths is aptly portrayed with background elements or peoples.
A complete package of comic entertainment that’s not to missed. Those who still aren’t reading this comic is really missing a lot.
Random Errors in science research occur with enough frequency that it is of concern in the scientific quest to gain new knowledge. Random errors can be caused by numerous things, such as inconsistencies or imprecision in equipment used to measure data, in experimenter measurements, in individual differences between participants who are being measured, or in experimental procedures. To compensate for, and to ameliorate the overall accuracy of scientific data, researchers use the concept of replication to magnify the presence of the causal effects while diminishing the impact of random error. Today in our three series of our hero, we see that Mr. Reardon has very cleverly displayed the concepts of random error and how it can result in the appearance of effect that is not in keeping with our normative, day-to-day “data”:
1. In the first example, we see an example of random error as viewed in the eyes of the swanky hotel’s bellman. When our hero disembarks from his taxi dressed “to-the-nines” the waiting bellman has a wide grin upon his face in expectation of a well- deserved tip in the future for his labors with Bozo. However, upon observing that our hero is transporting his belongings “hobo-style” the bellman’s expectations are dashed, and he now grimaces as he realizes he was the subject of a random error in that Bozo’s dashing appearance at the onset would not lead to the causal effect he had hoped for.
2. In the second series, there are two examples of random error to notice. After our hero secures his bicycle with the robust padlock, he feels confident he can mosey about with his business safely. Yet, a nearby ne’er-do-well observes the locked bicycle and perceives an opportunity for gain. The thief has the skills to pick a lock of the caliber Bozo has used and does so for his own benefit. Yet, he has a random error in that he stops assessing the true options for gain in his thievery, and simply leaves with the lock itself. The second random error is in Bozo’s perplexed response at the end… he is not sure if he can believe what he sees…. he feels certain the lock was in place, but now the lock is not there…. while the bicycle remains. This is a random error in logic, for our hero cannot piece the scene together in any logical fashion in his mind, for the current data defies his logic.
3. In the third series, we find the street cleaner fellow going about his normal task of removing dirt and other debris from the landscape. He does so with stalwart dedication to his duty, even though the task itself is laborious and unpleasant. Bozo, ever the keen observer of life, watches the fellow in his repetitive task, but then inadvertently is scooped up along with street debris. This particular random error on the part of the street cleaner most likely is a result of his NOT paying careful enough attention to his own efforts. This is a common malady in science research as well, for many data collecting tasks are similarly repetitive and as mundane as the street cleaner’s efforts. Both the work of the street cleaner and the work of the scientist ARE valuable and important, so both of these workers need to be more cognizant of the risk of the lack of focus and attention to detail in their work.
danketaz Premium Member over 3 years ago
1 Have bindlestiff will travel.
2 I guess the lock cost more than the bike. (or the guy needed the practice).
3 So that’s how they got the Umbrella Guy the other day.
Gent over 3 years ago
1. Bozo the elite commoner.
2. A good lock is more valuable than a bicycle.
3. Being too close to the action isn’t a good thing.
Gent over 3 years ago
Every day I keeps getting impressed by Foxo Reardon’s incredible talent of expressing a funny with no words.
And one has to especially appreciate the artwork with spectacular perspectives. In each comic he ensures three dimensional depths is aptly portrayed with background elements or peoples.
A complete package of comic entertainment that’s not to missed. Those who still aren’t reading this comic is really missing a lot.
Ninette over 3 years ago
1. A not so jolly swag man.
Kip Williams over 3 years ago
Bad place for a bike lock, but the police are finally getting a handle on the rash of umbrella thefts in the area.
Mark Thomas over 3 years ago
1. When you stay at a high dollar place, you got to bring your high dollar luggage.
2. You know it’s a bad neighborhood when your lock isn’t safe.
3. Never get too close to people when they work. That’s why I always watch from across the street, in the building, from my bar stool.
Pipe Tobacco Premium Member over 3 years ago
Random Errors in science research occur with enough frequency that it is of concern in the scientific quest to gain new knowledge. Random errors can be caused by numerous things, such as inconsistencies or imprecision in equipment used to measure data, in experimenter measurements, in individual differences between participants who are being measured, or in experimental procedures. To compensate for, and to ameliorate the overall accuracy of scientific data, researchers use the concept of replication to magnify the presence of the causal effects while diminishing the impact of random error. Today in our three series of our hero, we see that Mr. Reardon has very cleverly displayed the concepts of random error and how it can result in the appearance of effect that is not in keeping with our normative, day-to-day “data”:
1. In the first example, we see an example of random error as viewed in the eyes of the swanky hotel’s bellman. When our hero disembarks from his taxi dressed “to-the-nines” the waiting bellman has a wide grin upon his face in expectation of a well- deserved tip in the future for his labors with Bozo. However, upon observing that our hero is transporting his belongings “hobo-style” the bellman’s expectations are dashed, and he now grimaces as he realizes he was the subject of a random error in that Bozo’s dashing appearance at the onset would not lead to the causal effect he had hoped for.
Pipe Tobacco Premium Member over 3 years ago
2. In the second series, there are two examples of random error to notice. After our hero secures his bicycle with the robust padlock, he feels confident he can mosey about with his business safely. Yet, a nearby ne’er-do-well observes the locked bicycle and perceives an opportunity for gain. The thief has the skills to pick a lock of the caliber Bozo has used and does so for his own benefit. Yet, he has a random error in that he stops assessing the true options for gain in his thievery, and simply leaves with the lock itself. The second random error is in Bozo’s perplexed response at the end… he is not sure if he can believe what he sees…. he feels certain the lock was in place, but now the lock is not there…. while the bicycle remains. This is a random error in logic, for our hero cannot piece the scene together in any logical fashion in his mind, for the current data defies his logic.
3. In the third series, we find the street cleaner fellow going about his normal task of removing dirt and other debris from the landscape. He does so with stalwart dedication to his duty, even though the task itself is laborious and unpleasant. Bozo, ever the keen observer of life, watches the fellow in his repetitive task, but then inadvertently is scooped up along with street debris. This particular random error on the part of the street cleaner most likely is a result of his NOT paying careful enough attention to his own efforts. This is a common malady in science research as well, for many data collecting tasks are similarly repetitive and as mundane as the street cleaner’s efforts. Both the work of the street cleaner and the work of the scientist ARE valuable and important, so both of these workers need to be more cognizant of the risk of the lack of focus and attention to detail in their work.
tims145 over 3 years ago
No matter how fast U.G. runs away from the pursuing cop, note how erect his bumbershoot remains.