Prickly City by Scott Stantis for February 15, 2022

  1. 92131731 10214180593663282 3751105281048707072 n
    B 8671  over 2 years ago

    I’d sign it.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    PraiseofFolly  over 2 years ago

    Toreador, be on your guard!

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    winowino Premium Member over 2 years ago

    This ran it’s course long ago – enough.

     •  Reply
  4. Lifi
    rossevrymn  over 2 years ago

    A libertarian, a vegan, and a crossfitter walk into a bar. How do you know which is which?Don’t worry, they’ll tell you……………………….FOR MORE LIKE THIS GO TO: https://upjoke.com/libertarian-jokes

     •  Reply
  5. Cheshirecat chandra complg 1024
    Silly Season   over 2 years ago

    Whatever the causes of polarization, there is a relatively straightforward solution to our current predicament that has been embraced by most advanced industrial democracies: proportional representation.

    There are many versions of this approach, but they all involve some way of electing multiple people, at once, to represent a region.

    In a proportional system, parties representing as little as 1 percent of the electorate can gain representation, though the most stable systems usually have a threshold percentage level to prevent truly marginal parties from gaining seats.

    The regions can be as large as an entire nation — but even when they are smaller they tend to be larger than the 435 tiny US congressional districts, each of which is run according to the “winner take all” principle.

    Under a proportional system, if you want to live in a big, liberal city in a liberal state, you don’t give up the chance to make a difference with your vote.

    There is also very little possibility for consequential gerrymandering in proportional representation systems, since districts tend to be so big that there’s not much to gain from alternative line-drawings.

    Perhaps most significantly, proportional representation makes third parties more viable. In the US system, many voters might prefer a third party, in theory, but in a winner-take-all scenario a vote for a third party is a wasted vote, since only the two major parties stand a chance of winning.

    As a result, most proportional systems have at least three major parties, often more. This produces a wider diversity of perspectives in the representative body, and more potential for bargaining across different issues.

    ~

    https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/4/26/15425492/proportional-voting-polarization-urban-rural-third-parties

     •  Reply
  6. Kw eyecon 20190702 091103
    Kip Williams  over 2 years ago

    No lie detected.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    christelisbetty  over 2 years ago

    Here’s a crazy idea Carmen: Put your table up somewhere near foot traffic.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Prickly City