WuMo by Wulff & Morgenthaler for April 24, 2022

  1. Mm wp001
    allen@home  over 2 years ago

    Your tax dollars at work.

     •  Reply
  2. Googly eyes
    John Wiley Premium Member over 2 years ago

    The ancient road does have the advantage of not having to support 8,000 pound tourist vans and 50,000 pound trucks.

     •  Reply
  3. Animiertes spass lustig bild 0179
    in-dubio-pro-rainbow  over 2 years ago

    Rrr…Oh, man!

     •  Reply
  4. 01img582
    bixya  over 2 years ago

    The streets of Rome are full of holes … it has always been like this, since the dawn of time! And if an Italian tells you …

     •  Reply
  5. Photo 1501706362039 c06b2d715385
    Zebrastripes  over 2 years ago

    This is true! States can build better and longer lasting roads, but they choose not to…..

    In this country, a building is considered old at 30-50 yrs old and toon down…in .Europe, the buildings are from ancient times….and preserved…….not torn down…..I know AMERICA doesn’t have the history like Europe but stop tearing down the beautiful structures ….enough already

     •  Reply
  6. Img 1610
    WCraft Premium Member over 2 years ago

    Spot on! (Unlike the technical aspects of the comments section of GoComics the past 2 weeks)

     •  Reply
  7. Red skelton
    Daltongang Premium Member over 2 years ago

    Well they just don’t build things like they used to.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    sandflea  over 2 years ago

    The roads at Disneyworld after DeSatan signed the new law.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    oldlady07 Premium Member over 2 years ago

    Streets in our local small town had lots of potholes which seemed to quickly reappear after being “fixed”. A local dentist wrote a letter to our paper offering to teach the crew how to repair those “cavities” so they didn’t come back.

     •  Reply
  10. Avatar2
    Walrus Gumbo Premium Member over 2 years ago

    Can’t wait for that infrastructure plan to kickstart!!!

     •  Reply
  11. Picture
    TSRaman  over 2 years ago

    “We were …” not “We are …”

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From WuMo