“Galactus was simply another in a long line of super-villains whom we loved creating. …[W]e felt the only way to top ourselves was to come up with an evil-doer who had almost godlike powers. Therefore, the natural choice was sort of a demi-god, but now what would we do with him? We didn’t want to use the tired old cliche about him wanting to conquer the world. There were enough would-be world conquerors in the Marvel Universe and in all the other comic book galaxies. That was when inspiration struck. Why not have him not be a really evil person? After all, a demi-god should be beyond mere good and evil. He’d just be (don’t laugh!) hungry. And the nourishment he’d require is the life force and energy from living planets!”7
Izzy Moreno over 1 year ago
That was certainly productive.
MayCauseBurns over 1 year ago
I don’t think those were micro doses we took…
lavender headgear over 1 year ago
Did someone say “productive”?
Skeptical Meg over 1 year ago
I might watch that.
Steve Dallas over 1 year ago
The biggest villain in Marvel Comics is Dr Doom.
tarlrk Premium Member over 1 year ago
You just KNOW someone’s going to draw a hungry Univerctus, and I can’t wait to see the results.
General Trelane (Ret.) Premium Member over 1 year ago
Correction : Galactus devours worlds.
The Wolf In Your Midst over 1 year ago
Kinda wonder what these guys think of Morbius….
Skeptical Meg over 1 year ago
Doctor Manhattan… oops. Different universe.
Stephen Gilberg over 1 year ago
How about Dormammu? He eats worlds too.
cmxx over 1 year ago
Kudos to Mr. Meyer, who knows when to write “on to” and when to write “onto”!
ekke over 1 year ago
Actually, they could milk the 50% trick many more times, until the population goes to 1.
mistercatworks over 1 year ago
Properly maintained thought lines should never get derailed like this.
bonderenka over 1 year ago
“Galactus was simply another in a long line of super-villains whom we loved creating. …[W]e felt the only way to top ourselves was to come up with an evil-doer who had almost godlike powers. Therefore, the natural choice was sort of a demi-god, but now what would we do with him? We didn’t want to use the tired old cliche about him wanting to conquer the world. There were enough would-be world conquerors in the Marvel Universe and in all the other comic book galaxies. That was when inspiration struck. Why not have him not be a really evil person? After all, a demi-god should be beyond mere good and evil. He’d just be (don’t laugh!) hungry. And the nourishment he’d require is the life force and energy from living planets!”7
Izzy Moreno over 1 year ago
Wait a minute. Even if Kang kills 51% of all people, that’d be only half of the people Thanos didn’t kill, so 25.5%.
Percentages may increase, but the number of people killed will decrease.
If they milk that for 49 more movies, the villains will kill less and less people, so Baldie is right, they’ll never top Thanos.