I’m guessing that “authorship” will be in the eye of the beholder (reader). “Artists” who create collages and sculptures from “found materials” are still considered artists.
Have fun sharing your royalties with the actual creators whose copyrighted works were fed into your AI (or A “I”, if you like). Oh, wait, you’ll never have any royalties, since all you generated was a pile of rubbish.
I’ve read a couple of AI-created stories. Well, tried to read them. They’re dreadful. We’re a long, long way from Chat-GPT replacing authors. You can’t expect to put in something like, for example, “Write a novel about a couple falling in love in New Hampshire during Christmas” and get anything coherent, much less entertaining.
Yes, AI can make suggestions in specific areas. Some of these are good. Others are bad. It takes a human to know the difference.
Since that AI was was almost certainly trained on that author’s writing (along with thousands of others’ who were not compensated for their work) she should present the wannabe with a bill. Interesting how the wannabe thinks the actual writer is at fault.
TampaFanatic1 11 months ago
What a Brave New World we live in…….
Ida No 11 months ago
She used the AI from a distance, that makes her a teleprompter.
nancyb creator 11 months ago
First they came for the artists, but people did not complain because AI made them all ‘artists’.
RadioDial Premium Member 11 months ago
I’m guessing that “authorship” will be in the eye of the beholder (reader). “Artists” who create collages and sculptures from “found materials” are still considered artists.
moonfrogger 11 months ago
Another politician in the making.
PoodleGroomer 11 months ago
When an author is successful, all of the other writers will copy his ideas. AI will copy it in 5 minutes.
mokspr Premium Member 11 months ago
And in a computer lab in Urbana there is a voice coming out of a monitor saying " Yes, yes and soon my plan will be complete!"
LOLBeth 11 months ago
Have fun sharing your royalties with the actual creators whose copyrighted works were fed into your AI (or A “I”, if you like). Oh, wait, you’ll never have any royalties, since all you generated was a pile of rubbish.
Bilan 11 months ago
Do you think she’ll ever read the book that she wrote?
(to find out what happened)
willie_mctell 11 months ago
An infinite number of distinct programs and an infinite number of printers…
Ed The Red Premium Member 11 months ago
I’ve read a couple of AI-created stories. Well, tried to read them. They’re dreadful. We’re a long, long way from Chat-GPT replacing authors. You can’t expect to put in something like, for example, “Write a novel about a couple falling in love in New Hampshire during Christmas” and get anything coherent, much less entertaining.
Yes, AI can make suggestions in specific areas. Some of these are good. Others are bad. It takes a human to know the difference.
Dragoncat 11 months ago
Who needs A.I.? I’ll stick to my wild and wacky imagination to write my stories, thank you very much.
eddi-TBH 11 months ago
The fine arts have a new branch; the fake arts.
artjohn42 11 months ago
Since that AI was was almost certainly trained on that author’s writing (along with thousands of others’ who were not compensated for their work) she should present the wannabe with a bill. Interesting how the wannabe thinks the actual writer is at fault.
Aladar30 Premium Member 11 months ago
Kinda depressing.