‘Jack Smith is going to come out swinging’: Trump warned he’s about to be hit hard
After the U.S. Supreme Court issued its Monday ruling protecting Donald Trump from some of the charges brought by special counsel Jack Smith related to the 2020 election, legal analysts predict it is still possible to have some hearings before the election.
trump faces 40 charges in the Southern District of Florida for mishandling classified documents and a conspiracy to obstruct the investigation. That case was regarded as a “slam dunk” for special counsel Jack Smith, but it has been repeatedly delayed by trump-friendly decisions from trump-appointed Cannon.
In his concurrence in the immunity ruling, Thomas explains how Cannon could give Trump a pass on everything and dismiss the case.
Thomas’ concurrence doesn’t just signal his enthusiastic agreement with the idea that trump should not be prosecuted; it includes what might as well be a letter directly to Cannon. And while Thomas’ concurrence is not binding, it could still be an invitation to bring this particular question—whether the role of the special counsel is unconstitutional—back to the Supreme Court.
Thomas is providing Cannon with a basis on which she can dismiss all charges brought by the special counsel against trump, and assuring her that, should such an issue find its way to the Supreme Court, it would find at least one receptive justice. Of course his fellow traitor Alito would cosign in a heart beat, proving that calls for these two seditious traitors should have recused.
Everyone on the left has gone bonkers. SCOTUS did not get rid of impeachment. Or trials in the Senate. Or the 25th Amendment. Or the elections.
Loons on the left brought this on themselves with the lawfare strategy and SCOTUS simply reminded them that immunity has always been there. But for the lawfare and weaponized DOJ, there would be no SCOTUS ruling. Is there outrage that members of Congress have immunity form anything the say on the floor? Of course not. It’s there like it is for the President. No matter who it is.
And the immunity decision is not the one to fear. Fear the Chevron reversal ruling. That took a lot of power from the Executive Branch.
He’ll just have his MAGA thugs (modern Nazi Brown Shirts) do the wet work, and then pardon them. The trick is to avoid local and state murders until a MAGA rubber-stamp Congress makes the King immune from state crimes (they’ve already tried that). Or, simply do the evil deeds in “red” MAGA / Nazi states.
Look for state secessions and actual Civil War to break out if the Joker is made King.
Mad Max dystopia is their wet dream. Sorry MAGA creeps, but it’s not as pleasant as you think it will be.
NOTE: Contrary to aristoclesplato9, there is no lawfare currently; it only existed when Orange Jesus was president (remember why James Comey was fired?) and will exist again if he is re-elected. This has nothing to do with “official acts” as overturning a free and fair election is not an official act. No is taking and hiding government records, and ignoring a subpoena. Suborning perjury is still a crime for most people. And the Chevron ruling did not take a lot of power from the Executive Branch as much as it gave power to Big Business to rape, pillage, plunder, pollute, run amok without any oversight. In short, don’t let experts who have immense knowledge make rules, let Big Business, with help from unelected judges, make rules.
The only immunity mentioned in the Constitution is in the Speech and Debate clause. No where does it mention immunity for the President. Essentially, Roberts rewrote the constitution and did so using circular logic.
As if a political (not criminal) trial with half the jury composed of mobster gang members would vote to convict their Mafia boss. That’s just one stupid talking point shot down for a radicalized useful idiot.
They have “impeachment” in Russia, too. Aristopollyanna would stupidly argue that the rubber-stamp Duma could (theoretically) impeach Putin, too.
Kurtass Premium Member 6 days ago
There it is.
Radish the wordsmith 6 days ago
‘Jack Smith is going to come out swinging’: Trump warned he’s about to be hit hard
After the U.S. Supreme Court issued its Monday ruling protecting Donald Trump from some of the charges brought by special counsel Jack Smith related to the 2020 election, legal analysts predict it is still possible to have some hearings before the election.
dotbup 6 days ago
trump faces 40 charges in the Southern District of Florida for mishandling classified documents and a conspiracy to obstruct the investigation. That case was regarded as a “slam dunk” for special counsel Jack Smith, but it has been repeatedly delayed by trump-friendly decisions from trump-appointed Cannon.
In his concurrence in the immunity ruling, Thomas explains how Cannon could give Trump a pass on everything and dismiss the case.
Thomas’ concurrence doesn’t just signal his enthusiastic agreement with the idea that trump should not be prosecuted; it includes what might as well be a letter directly to Cannon. And while Thomas’ concurrence is not binding, it could still be an invitation to bring this particular question—whether the role of the special counsel is unconstitutional—back to the Supreme Court.
Thomas is providing Cannon with a basis on which she can dismiss all charges brought by the special counsel against trump, and assuring her that, should such an issue find its way to the Supreme Court, it would find at least one receptive justice. Of course his fellow traitor Alito would cosign in a heart beat, proving that calls for these two seditious traitors should have recused.
aristoclesplato9 6 days ago
Everyone on the left has gone bonkers. SCOTUS did not get rid of impeachment. Or trials in the Senate. Or the 25th Amendment. Or the elections.
Loons on the left brought this on themselves with the lawfare strategy and SCOTUS simply reminded them that immunity has always been there. But for the lawfare and weaponized DOJ, there would be no SCOTUS ruling. Is there outrage that members of Congress have immunity form anything the say on the floor? Of course not. It’s there like it is for the President. No matter who it is.
And the immunity decision is not the one to fear. Fear the Chevron reversal ruling. That took a lot of power from the Executive Branch.
Zuhl's Wife 6 days ago
He’ll just have his MAGA thugs (modern Nazi Brown Shirts) do the wet work, and then pardon them. The trick is to avoid local and state murders until a MAGA rubber-stamp Congress makes the King immune from state crimes (they’ve already tried that). Or, simply do the evil deeds in “red” MAGA / Nazi states.
Look for state secessions and actual Civil War to break out if the Joker is made King.
Mad Max dystopia is their wet dream. Sorry MAGA creeps, but it’s not as pleasant as you think it will be.
Zuhl's Wife 6 days ago
P.S. I won’t be alive to see it, but you MAGA creeps and your families will suffer for your own sheer inhuman stupidity.
wildthing 6 days ago
We know what Trump will do. Will Biden do ANYTHING?
sincavage05 6 days ago
And anyone else that dares to doubt me. I’ll just write it off as a presidential action, ha you won’t be able to touch me.
kaffekup 6 days ago
“Justice” Roberts:
“Close enough! You’re president now!”
Zuhl's Wife 6 days ago
In the Cartman v. United States SCOTUS ruling:
“I’ll do what I wannnnt!”
Zuhl's Wife 6 days ago
“When the President does it, it’s not illegal”
- R. Nixon
That was 52 years ago. Now, words to the same effect are the LAW[fare] of the land, courtesy of the corrupt MAGA SCOTUS.
Come on MAGA creeps. Tell us how different it is.
Jack7528 6 days ago
Fear porn!
braindead Premium Member 6 days ago
About a quarter of the MAGAts believe Trump would not have his enemies executed. Another quarter know he would.
The remaining half have never heard the rulings of the Supreme Tribunal.
tpcox928 5 days ago
NOTE: Contrary to aristoclesplato9, there is no lawfare currently; it only existed when Orange Jesus was president (remember why James Comey was fired?) and will exist again if he is re-elected. This has nothing to do with “official acts” as overturning a free and fair election is not an official act. No is taking and hiding government records, and ignoring a subpoena. Suborning perjury is still a crime for most people. And the Chevron ruling did not take a lot of power from the Executive Branch as much as it gave power to Big Business to rape, pillage, plunder, pollute, run amok without any oversight. In short, don’t let experts who have immense knowledge make rules, let Big Business, with help from unelected judges, make rules.
steveandeileen 5 days ago
The only immunity mentioned in the Constitution is in the Speech and Debate clause. No where does it mention immunity for the President. Essentially, Roberts rewrote the constitution and did so using circular logic.
ncorgbl 5 days ago
Who will vote for a guy with a rape judgement and 34 felony convictions? Says a lot about them.
Zuhl's Wife 5 days ago
“SCOTUS did not get rid of impeachment.”
As if a political (not criminal) trial with half the jury composed of mobster gang members would vote to convict their Mafia boss. That’s just one stupid talking point shot down for a radicalized useful idiot.
They have “impeachment” in Russia, too. Aristopollyanna would stupidly argue that the rubber-stamp Duma could (theoretically) impeach Putin, too.