One doesn’t provide information in a disagreement to influence the person with which they have said disagreement. One provides it for the uncommitted bystander with no personal stake in the argument.
sometimes I want to understand why someone else chooses the way they do. I may not change my choice but at least I can see some of the reasons people think otherwise. And it is all good until people start calling each other names. If they make a personal attack first, I won.
Zykoic 17 days ago
The ultimate trollation.
incognito 16 days ago
What? A keyboard warrior surrendered! Colour me Shocked!
chief tommy 16 days ago
Fake news
dsatvoinde Premium Member 16 days ago
Looks about right.
chris_o42 16 days ago
And that would do it…
rockyridge1977 16 days ago
The end of time??
Malph 16 days ago
Had to block my sister due to her endless rants.
baskate_2000 16 days ago
Wow, there may be hope after all!
ChessPirate 16 days ago
His account got hacked… ☺
ncorgbl 16 days ago
Into what?
KEA 16 days ago
There was someone rational on Facebook?!?!
bilbrlsn 16 days ago
One doesn’t provide information in a disagreement to influence the person with which they have said disagreement. One provides it for the uncommitted bystander with no personal stake in the argument.
marilynnbyerly 16 days ago
I don’t bother. They LOVE to waste my time. Idiots be idiots.
cuzinron47 16 days ago
Must have been talking to Putin.
car2ner 16 days ago
sometimes I want to understand why someone else chooses the way they do. I may not change my choice but at least I can see some of the reasons people think otherwise. And it is all good until people start calling each other names. If they make a personal attack first, I won.
eddi-TBH 16 days ago
He reprogrammed a bot. That’s even more dramatic.