Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for October 09, 2008

  1. Georg von rosen   oden som vandringsman  1886  odin  the wanderer
    runar  about 16 years ago

    If they want to interrogate prisoners, they should play political ads for them all day. Those guys would be babbling like idjits in no time.

     •  Reply
  2. Rocky bw 2 090507
    BirishB  about 16 years ago

    “This”

     •  Reply
  3. Frog4
    Digital Frog  about 16 years ago

    Yep, this would be my choice too.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    LeonardWatson  about 16 years ago

    If they really wanted to torture prisoners they should force them to listen to Obama babble all day. Fifteen minutes into any Obama speech and the prisoners would go insane. Of course then they would actually think that anything Obama says really does make sense.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    The_Rav  about 16 years ago

    Good choice, upside-down man. I’d be upside down, too.

     •  Reply
  6. Possum
    Possum Pete  about 16 years ago

    Yeah, that Obama sure can talk, you betcha, duh! Pit Bull, Hockey Mom, lipstick, duh! Associated with Terrorists, duh! You betcha (wink), duh!

    Yup, she’s a much better choice.

     •  Reply
  7. Tippy 008
    Tippy2  about 16 years ago

    Amen, brother!!

     •  Reply
  8. Hix8jcafq38ykcahzgk4ica7yjqwncanznwn0cabhg37sca0xdg9wcaq7nrxyca1i6mytca0ckoyhcagkcf42ca01k9zkcazaaft5ca1b4kj3cab3vjvkcafw5x50caylpbjfcau0pghjcayzqgx5carfgc37
    hcrobin85  about 16 years ago

    They should play debates for those at Gitmo!!

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    Kaero  about 16 years ago

    Looks good to me…but, then, I’m in grad school for theatre, so skipping the debates doesn’t do me any good…I just get to hear crappy Sarah Palin imitations every morning before class.

    At this point, I don’t care who wins. I just want this campaign OVER!

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    John Reppert  about 16 years ago

    AMEN KAERO AMEN

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    LeonardWatson  about 16 years ago

    Possum Pete: About all Obama can do is talk. With his silver tongue he has managed to convince many people that he should be president without ever once really saying anything of substance. He wants change, but he is unable to define what change would mean. Except of course to strip Americans of their rights and usher us into a one-world government. That is change we cannot stand for. Stop Obama now!

     •  Reply
  12. Gil avatar
    gaj1967  about 16 years ago

    I don’t want change. I want the whole bleeep dollar.

     •  Reply
  13. Celtic cross3
    DerekA  about 16 years ago

    Oh - I see “change” coming - I see Sen Obama keeping his promise of not raising taxes - he will just let the tax cuts expire. Yep and then he will take my “change”.

     •  Reply
  14. Awww
    Alexus_The_Great  about 16 years ago

    Gil: Do you want 4 more years of this same bleeep???

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    LeonardWatson  about 16 years ago

    Alexus: And what makes you think that putting McCain in office will result in four more years of the same? That is straight from the Obama illogic campaign. I got news for all of you Obama disciples: McCain is not George Bush. Really, he is a completely different person that will do things differently than G. Bush does. In fact, simply electing McCain would be change. So if you want change you can still vote for McCain, instead of handing our freedoms over to be stripped away.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    robertolopez144  about 16 years ago

    I like it. Now Thats what you call, Political Satire, Oh, the humanity LOL!!! - you guys have all been saying the same thing since the beginning of Adam,this sounds familiar, and guess who’s going to win, Obama. All by the grace of God and Jesus Christ, no wonder children and women and even men are scared, so go on keep hating God will make more.

     •  Reply
  17. Buddy
    lalas  about 16 years ago

    Leonard… there are more specifics about Obama’s plans than McSame’s. In the debate McSame flim-flammed around with generalities while Obama made detailed points about a number of his plans.

    You must not have watched it.

    You could always go his website if you really cared, which you clearly don’t.

     •  Reply
  18. Buddy
    lalas  about 16 years ago

    Derek if you think about it… the republicans voted for the largest tax increase in history by voting for these ridiculously unsustainable tax cuts.

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    The_Rav  about 16 years ago

    If any of you think there is going to be any real change for the better, I’m sure someone will sell you a neat bridge in Brooklyn. Or, for you Bill Engval fans, if you really think there’s going to be real change for the better, here’s your sign.

     •  Reply
  20. Alife
    alife  about 16 years ago

    What’s the REAL difference?

     •  Reply
  21. Missing large
    tobybartels  about 16 years ago

    alife asks:

    What’s the REAL difference?

    I used to think that I'd prefer Obama to win over McCain, on the grounds that Obama was less likely to start yet another war. After all, McCain has basically promised to invade Iran. But Obama has basically promised to invade Pakistan, so … not much.

    Any of these people would do: http://www.dailypaul.com/node/61153 I haven't decided yet whom I'll vote for, but it won't be a warmonger like Obama or McCain.

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    LeonardWatson  about 16 years ago

    lalas I did watch the debates, that is how I know that Osama would be a disaster of epic proportions that this country may never recover from. Osama will strip away your second amendment rights, stand in the way of traditional marriage and family, nominate activist justices to the Supreme court and lower courts, raise taxes, keep the invasion of illegal immigrants flowing freely into this country, pull our troops out of Iraq before they finish their job, and so much more. If you are proud to be an American and enjoy the rights and priviages that gives you there is no way you can vote for Osama. On the other hand if you let the liberal media tell you what to think then I guess you will be casting an uniformed vote for osama.

     •  Reply
  23. Buddy
    lalas  about 16 years ago

    Leonard – He is not going to “invade Pakistan.” If they know where a group of Al Qaeda are in the border regions and the Pakistanis can not or will not do anything about it they’ll surgically strike.

    And what’s your bleeep about the 2nd Amendment? It’s out of Far Right field.

     •  Reply
  24. Missing large
    LeonardWatson  about 16 years ago

    lalas, Osama is the most anti-gun candidate to ever run for president. He will try to take away your second amendment rights without a second thought. Do your research he has never once voted for a bill that supports or expands your second amendment rights. He already controls the media now he want to disarm the people…Sounds just like Hitler. Osama is change this country cannot afford.

     •  Reply
  25. Buddy
    lalas  about 16 years ago

    Nice job of refusing to SUBSTANTIATE your claims. Provide links to support your diatribe.

     •  Reply
  26. Missing large
    pheonixeaglescorpion  7 months ago

    That would be my choice too!

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur