Not unequal distribution of wealth, but inequitable distribution.
Some will always have more than others (and you can’t do away with the profit motive entirely), but that so many should have so little while so few have so much is unconscienable. That a CEO can make 500 times as much as one of his employees is an abomination; nobody can POSSIBLY “earn” $20,000,000 per year.
Thanks for this about the 99%! The comics are usually against the conservative viewpoint. It’s one of the only thing that the mainstream media hasn’t completely censored. Since the media is controlled by the big fat cats, things are not reportede. In the 1940’s there were over 100 labor editors since the 80’s they shrank to 5, now I doubt if there even are any! Same thing, back before the 8o’, there were many independent newspapers, now there are only a few and they are owned by big corporations.
Hillbillyman about 13 years ago
old joke but a good one.
fritzoid Premium Member about 13 years ago
Not unequal distribution of wealth, but inequitable distribution.
Some will always have more than others (and you can’t do away with the profit motive entirely), but that so many should have so little while so few have so much is unconscienable. That a CEO can make 500 times as much as one of his employees is an abomination; nobody can POSSIBLY “earn” $20,000,000 per year.
pam Miner about 13 years ago
Thanks for this about the 99%! The comics are usually against the conservative viewpoint. It’s one of the only thing that the mainstream media hasn’t completely censored. Since the media is controlled by the big fat cats, things are not reportede. In the 1940’s there were over 100 labor editors since the 80’s they shrank to 5, now I doubt if there even are any! Same thing, back before the 8o’, there were many independent newspapers, now there are only a few and they are owned by big corporations.