FoxTrot Classics by Bill Amend for March 02, 2012
Transcript:
Man: That'll be $159.27. Peter: What?! Man: You've got nine CDs here, kid. Peter: I know, but I figure with the courts putting the screws to napster, you have a great opportunity to win back former customers like me. Man: By doing what? Peter: Letting me have these for free. Some people have no business smarts.
finkd over 12 years ago
And some people have no smarts at all.
SwimsWithSharks over 12 years ago
As the Napster T-shirt said, “Thank you for sharing”
Itunes: music for people too lazy to share.
ShadowBeast Premium Member over 12 years ago
Yes Jason you have no business sense.
YatInExile over 12 years ago
Kids want the sun & the moon but they don’t want to pay for it.
Doctor11 over 12 years ago
Nice try, Peter, but it doesn’t work that way at all.
Waddling Eagle over 12 years ago
Since Peter expects other people to work for free, we now know what his labor is worth.
corfy over 12 years ago
Hey, 2/3 of my music collection is legally free music. Of course, that 2/3 is all independent artists… and I didn’t get physical CDs. But I think free music sounds better (whether that makes me a hipster, a cheapskate, anti-establishment or broadminded, I haven’t decided yet.)
fishbulb239 over 12 years ago
Actually, Peter’s not entirely wrong. Music distributors had a great thing going when CDs first came out – they could sell both tapes and CDs and charge a premium for the higher-quality CDs even though their production cost was lower. The market supported an absurdly high mark-up. However, as technology improvements made digital distribution and sharing a lot easier and thereby changed the market, the CD producers did not adapt and the industry has had its troubles since. Had they dropped CD prices and found ways to sell (and protect) MP3s instead of simply trying to go after all of the illegal distribution, they would be in a lot better shape.
DerkinsVanPelt218 over 12 years ago
Fast forward ten years, most places I go have been slashing prices on their CDs to compete with digital download services, or cutting their inventory of them altogether. And replace “Napster” with “BitTorrent” and you have a solid depiction of this whole situation.
drawingpad over 12 years ago
LoL the sign on the register changed in panel 3
Phosphoros over 12 years ago
Actually, it does sometimes work that way to a point. And Peter has something of a point. Google and Facebook (to name a few) have offered plenty of free ‘intellectual property’ or services or media to the public and have done very well indeed. Ideas are infinitely reproducible. Didn’t the Grateful Dead allow all their concerts to be videotaped or recorded, even encouraged that? It paid off nicely for them in the extra exposure.
tnazar over 12 years ago
Actually – Jason and Peter shared the same punch line today. no wonder the confusion.
Random Lurker Premium Member over 12 years ago
Holy sheep, that’s 17.70 per CD!Makes me feel better about getting full albums on Amazon for 6-9 bucks each :)
kamikaze-kumquat over 3 years ago
And, you can think Metallica for the DMCA hellscape we live in now here in 2021 since they were the ones that started that crap during the Napster days. Now we can’t even have background music on during a Twitch or youtube stream without someone trying to sue. And, the record industry wonders why everyone is stealing their stuff again.