One Big Happy by Rick Detorie for May 17, 2012

  1. Username catfeet
    Catfeet Premium Member over 12 years ago

    Hopefully, they water-boarded the little creep!

     •  Reply
  2. Jamie fb002
    wvhappypappy  over 12 years ago

    “Dear, this water tastes like…Oh, never mind…”

     •  Reply
  3. Felipe
    Strod  over 12 years ago

    Well, duh! “Pussy” told on him. After all almost all animals in those nursery rhymes can talk. Why not a cat?

     •  Reply
  4. Felipe
    Strod  over 12 years ago

    BTW, half of those nursery rhymes describe unspeakable acts and shouldn’t be suitable for kids. .In this case, a boy threw a cat into a water well. I’m surprised Ruthie didn’t denounce it as extreme cruelty to an animal.

     •  Reply
  5. Thinker1
    Fan o’ Lio.  over 12 years ago

    What’s a “water well”? …. Well?

     •  Reply
  6. Coffee turtle avatar
    coffeeturtle  over 12 years ago

    Ninja Kitty got what was comin’ to her!

    just kidding folks. ;-)

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    iced tea  over 12 years ago

    It just a rhyme about a bratty kid who put a cat in a well. Yes, it’s animal cruelty. Bless Johnny Stout for rescuing the poor little cat. Ruthie should be reading Judy Blume’s novels about girls her age. These kids act like real kids.

     •  Reply
  8. Dscn7190 small
    stuart  over 12 years ago

    Courts still don’t understand chimerism – which has been the source of injustice when using DNA testing. Everone is at least slightly chimeric, typically having 50000 or so of their mothers cells. Get a transplant, you have more. Often, one siamese twin is complete absorbed, and the resulting person has two sets of DNA. For instance, a mother applies for welfare. They do a maternity test, which comes up negative, and instead of helping, they take all her kids away – despite testimony from both the father and the obstetrician that they personally witnessed/delivered those kids from her body. What happened? Her ovaries were from her siamese twin.

    A star athlete wins a championship, but they take his gold medal away after a blood test to check for “blood doping” (getting a blood transfusion before a competition to boost performance). A doctor later takes multiple DNA samples and shows that the athletes body has two sets of DNA, and all of his blood DNA matches some part of his body. There was no blood doping. But the medal has already been given to someone else.

    I could go on, but courts/juries don’t understand the limitations of DNA testing.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment